Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 12



Template:Infobox Canterbury College

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Infobox Canterbury College - unused

replaced by infobox residential college. Frietjes (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  21:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ElSalvadordepartment

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ElSalvadordepartment

Redundant to Infobox settlement. Unused. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete A complete mess, ugly and redundant. Unused. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  20:19, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * delete. and, in case anyone is interested, I was the one who orphaned it. Frietjes (talk) 20:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Trans-Siberian Railway/Expanded

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Trans-Siberian Railway/Expanded

redundant to Trans-Siberian Railway and likely to not stay in sync. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:32, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  21:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No longer used. I'm the author. Sorry for not commenting sooner. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dow Jones Industrial Average Components

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge with article, and delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:28, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Dow Jones Industrial Average Components

This chart would be far better suited to being directly placed on the Dow Jones Industrial Average page. It is currently only used on that page and is too bulky to serve as a navbox (which already exists anyway). Moreover, so long as it remains in Template space, its logo column is destined to remain unfilled (since many logos are unfree images). I propose copying it to the DIJA page and then deleting the template. Thoughts? Lockesdonkey (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * As a data table which is only used on a single article, this should indeed be part of that article's code rather than a standalone template. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I also agree, it makes much more sense to just have this on the Dow Jones Industrial Average page. Sargdub (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Spa

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Withdrawing my nomination J04n(talk page) 11:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC) :Spa I find this tag particularly bitey and unnecessary. We say that anyone can contribute to our discussions then go and tag newbies. Also, closing admins can easily tell if something is fishy without the tag. J04n(talk page) 11:27, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.