Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 November 24



Template:Young Montana

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Young Montana

A navigation box for an artist that does not even have an article themselves. It is not even used to navigate one single thing.  STATic  message me!  17:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedily if possible. Part of a series of creations by a sock farm for a series of hoax articles. -- Kinu  t/c 19:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2013 Bollywood Films

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete G5. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 2013 Bollywood Films

Unnecessary and can get out of bound. Plus we have categories for such surfing of "YYYY nationality films". Template for that is a bit too much. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 09:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's no need to produce a template which lists each of the scores of films produced in a certain country, and to slap it on the articles for every such film. The connection between the films is too general, and the resulting template is unwieldy.  This is what lists and categories are for. Psychonaut (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. 2013 in Indian film should be created, like 2013 in Israeli film. George Ho (talk) 00:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This template was created by a sockpuppet of Yasir72.multan. -- S M S   Talk 17:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2013 Indian Films

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete G5. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 2013 Indian Films

Unnecessary and can get out of bound. Plus we have categories for such surfing of "YYYY nationality films". Template for that is a bit too much. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 09:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's no need to produce a template which lists each of the scores of films produced in a certain country, and to slap it on the articles for every such film. The connection between the films is too general, and the resulting template is unwieldy. This is what lists and categories are for. Psychonaut (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Extremely unnecessary plus apprehend how many disputes will arise with it in due course of time. Classic example of one can create a template, that does'n't mean one should!.  Sohambanerjee1998  10:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The user in order to save the template from imminent deletion added to a few hundred articles so as to oppose with a rationale of wide usage. I had to remove it, ouch! my thumbs! Please delete it immediately before he hads it to another few hundred. I cannot do it again.  Sohambanerjee1998  12:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Will cause nothing but heartache. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 11:03, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no evidence whatsoever that a reader will want to navigate from one 2013 Indian film to another. Navboxes are designed for navigation, categories are designed for grouping. Betty Logan (talk) 11:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. India makes around 800 films a year, of which around 200 fall under the mid-high budget range. Try getting all of them listed in a template. + the current template generally focusses ONLY on Hindi cinema..--Stemoc (talk) 05:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This template was created by a sockpuppet of Yasir72.multan. -- S M S   Talk 17:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kylie Minogue selected single

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Kylie Minogue selected single

Unused. Portal inactive since 2011. Template consists mainly of red links. Magioladitis (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Points to a "selected articles" subpage that never existed. --RL0919 (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ZR

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ZR

All related pages have been deleted. Magioladitis (talk) 00:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not needed for navigation to mostly deleted pages. --RL0919 (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Peoria Rivermen roster

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Peoria Rivermen roster

Empty table that doesn't seem to be used anywhere. Template seems to have been (rightfully) cleared when the Peoria Rivermen (AHL) cleared out and was not repopulated when the Peoria Rivermen (SPHL) started. I don't know when a template like this is used on hockey pages, but it isn't used now (despite the Rivermen having played several games) and should be deleted if it's been abandoned. Closeapple (talk) 00:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obsolete. Resolute 00:27, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.