Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 20



Fort Lauderdale Strikers roster

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 2012 Fort Lauderdale Strikers roster
 * 2013 Fort Lauderdale Strikers roster

Unnecessary templates, they should only appear in one article only. – Michael (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 00:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * These are not "unnecessary" templates. Another user created them and they are very important as they detail the roster of a given year.  These templates are in one article (distinctly in the relating season year of the team).  They only link to the templates category or seasons category as part of the club's index.  Kindly leave these templates alone.  Thank you.  NYCWikiKid (talk) 03:55, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete both - we do not keep historical rosters of club teams for soccer, only major international tournaments. GiantSnowman 09:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Please Do not delete either one. These templates are only found in their respective page.
 * a) Template:2012 Fort Lauderdale Strikers roster - found in - 2012_Fort_Lauderdale_Strikers_season
 * b) Template:2012 Fort Lauderdale Strikers roster - found in - 2013_Fort_Lauderdale_Strikers_season
 * They are exclusively used there, and are only linked to their respective templates page for reference only - Category:Fort Lauderdale Strikers templates. These templates are vital to their respective page.  Thanks.  NYCWikiKid (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Like GS said, we don't keep historical roster of club teams. So both templates definitely need to go. – Michael (talk) 17:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Again, whosoever should read this, kindly analyze where these templates are located (one article per template) and what they represent to their respective pages. At the very least, ask the user who wants to delete this information to first transfer all content to a sortable table, if this individual is really looking to preserve important facts. The deletion of the template can be discussed.  Thanks.  NYCWikiKid (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete both - neither has much use as a navigational template, and the content would be adequately covered in the respective season articles if the template were transcluded. There is no need for a separate page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete both - the information can be displayed in the articles, thus making the templates unnecessary. EddieV2003 (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * delete after merging with articles. Frietjes (talk) 18:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete both - unnecessary templates. As per GS, club articles should not include "final squads". Fenix down (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox IPL team

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Infobox IPL team

It can be merged with Template:Infobox cricket team Magioladitis (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete-If not deleted then there should be separate infoboxes for different leagues.RRD13 (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect, this template will likely be recreated if deleted. --LT910001 (talk) 12:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:James Arthur

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * James Arthur

Fails WP:NENAN of having at least 5 relevant links, not counting "related articles" or the backlink. The Banner talk 11:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --LT910001 (talk) 12:04, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox pulps

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Infobox pulps

Four transclusions, redundant to Template:Infobox magazine. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom --LT910001 (talk) 12:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect. This isn't different enough to need a separate template. --Coemgenus (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dorrough
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Dorrough

Most of the content has been redirected, leaving only two albums and one single, far too little for WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 08:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ymovies person
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Ymovies person

When I filed this Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 13 I was unaware that this template was also out there. It is basically the same template so my objections are the same. I.E. Yahoo now uses these pages as a "current events" clearing house. In other words there will only be info there if Yahoo has a current article about the person. IMO that means that this EL is not useful for the readers of our article and I would recommend that it be Deleted MarnetteD | Talk 05:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be a variant of the recently deleted Template:Ymovies name and isn't in use. Betty Logan (talk) 05:54, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons as the previous TfD.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:20, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.