Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 13



Template:Andy Griffith

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Andy Griffith

Per WP:ACTOR. No prejudice against repurposing but not sure there's enough other related articles to do so (a Christmas album from 2003 and his "What It Was, Was Football" bit). Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 18:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * delete or repurpose. navigate by director, not actor.  may be useful to move this to  and refocus it. but, we already have Mayberry, so it's not clear that would be useful. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Keeping Up With the Kardashians

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirected Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keeping Up With the Kardashians
 * Keeping Up with the Kardashians

Propose merging Template:Keeping Up With the Kardashians with Template:Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

Template is duplicate of what already exists. – Recollected &#8226;   17:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * boldly redirected Frietjes (talk) 23:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The redirecting doesn't seem controversial, so the discussion could be closed.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cantinflas

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Cantinflas

Cantinflas is a producer and an actor. His four producing credits according to IMDb, do not have Wikipedia articles and are not listed in the template. The template does not even list all of his acting credits, just those distributed by Columbia Pictures. This acting template goes against WP:MOSFILM and WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers/Consensus summaries. Aspects (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * delete, navigate by director, not actor. Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete since there is a guideline explicitly against such navboxes.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ir-Philippines government

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merged Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Ir-Philippines government
 * Non-free Philippines government

Propose merging Template:Ir-Philippines government with Template:Non-free Philippines government.

Duplicate template. We only need Non-free Philippines government. Delete the "Ir" one and change into a redirect. Stefan2 (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * This was created so I could apply both this and a Non-free seal on some images. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That is not a reason for having two templates for the same thing as you can apply Non-free seal to either Philippines government template. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Support per nom, it should be called "Non-free Philippines government", as that is how other non-free templatees are name for the most part -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FIFA Presidents

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * FIFA Presidents

This template has been rendered obsolete by the much more detailed, which I have just created, and which already contains this information and much more. GiantSnowman 09:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - wouldn't the easiest be to redirect this old template to the new you've created? Mentoz86 (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't transclude anywhere, so maybe not - but agree it could be a sensible idea. GiantSnowman 13:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete because it is unused and redundant. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete although it is always preferable to orphan templates after a discussion at TfD, not before.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 01:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bohemia Interative
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Bohemia Interative

A new template with correct spelling is already formed. Cky2250 (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * What correct spelling????? Sw2nd (talk) 03:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Bohemia Interactive. GiantSnowman 09:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment you know, there's a move button you could use to rename the template --- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * speedy delete, db-author. -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.