Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 August 29



Anita Sarkeesian FAQs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Sarkeesian FAQ
 * Sarkeesian FAQ/FAQ

Unused, wrong namespace. The Talk:Anita Sarkeesian/FAQ is now the correct FAQ. These items may be safely excised. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 17:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete them as unused, now that they have been substituted in their single usages —PC-XT+ 05:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wilderness areas of Idaho map

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Wilderness areas of Idaho map

This is a template I created over two years ago. It has never been used, and I don't foresee a need to keep it. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 14:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Grand Junction

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn because the template is now used (non-admin closure). DH85868993 (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Grand Junction

Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 01:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - I was going to let this one get deleted, but I think I found the article it was intended for (Grand Junction Railroad and Depot Company). -User:DanTD (talk) 01:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - As noted by DanTD, there's an article for it, but it just has to be added to said article. BostonUrbEx (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * add it to Grand Junction Railroad and Depot Company. Frietjes (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Question - How do I do that? I just tried to expose the hidden template, and put it in an infobox. It wouldn't show up. -User:DanTD (talk) 00:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I usually don't like to edit templates while they are under discussion, but I did in this case to show it can be changed to include in an infobox, which I have done on Grand Junction Railroad and Depot Company. Anyone is free to revert, if they would like to, but then it will not work in that infobox in the same way. —PC-XT+ 04:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It may be this was intended to be joined with other templates. The problem was caused by the template producing table code outside of a table when transcluded. That is, it expected to be transcluded into a table structure similar to the one in its noinclude tags. This code was left out of the transclusions from the beginning, which is why I wonder if it was intentional, to be joined with other templates in a table, somehow. —PC-XT+ 05:14, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Header & Footer code has been cleaned up. Useddenim (talk) 12:28, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment (from nominator): Now that this template is used, I'm happy for this discussion to be closed as "Keep". DH85868993 (talk) 13:34, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. Template is now used. DH85868993 (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wildcat Branch

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn because the template is now used (non-admin closure). DH85868993 (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Wildcat Branch

Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 01:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - The article clearly exists (Wildcat Branch), and clearly can be used. -User:DanTD (talk) 01:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - As noted by DanTD, there's an article for it, but it just has to be added to said article. BostonUrbEx (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * add it to Wildcat Branch. Frietjes (talk) 16:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'd love to do it. Evidently though, it breaks apart unless it's attached to an infobox, just like the Grand Junction template. Anybody feel like making some? -User:DanTD (talk) 18:32, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe that the change I made to the above template would work on this one, as well —PC-XT+ 04:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Header & Footer code has been cleaned up, & template has been added to article. Useddenim (talk) 12:28, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment (from nominator): Now that this template is used, I'm happy for this discussion to be closed as "Keep". DH85868993 (talk) 13:34, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Move to Close - Great. You close this discussion and the Grand Junction one, I'll remove the tags. -User:DanTD (talk) 22:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn. Template is now used. DH85868993 (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.