Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 January 6



Template:Pepe Jeans

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Pepe Jeans

Only used in the article for the parent company, which itself is a borderline candidate for deletion as advertising. Entries are just a collection of models who might have participated in an advertising campaign for this company, not a strong enough connection for a navbox. WP:NENAN. NSH002 (talk) 14:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete, better as a list in the article, not as a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bronx Streets

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Bronx Streets

Superfluous to Template:Bronx streets, what is the content of this template. I think it is a failed move (this template has 2 capitals, the other one just one) The Banner talk 12:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as it can be replace with Bronx streets. Epicgenius (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * redirect. Frietjes (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FilmyHub title

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * FilmyHub title

Link does not meet the external link guidelines, being redundant to IMDB. WHOIS indicates the site is seven months old. Appears to have been created for promotional purposes -- see Special:Contributions/Patelkd1990, whose edits represent almost all of the usages of this template. MER-C 11:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete, adds very little, and unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sports Night

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Sports Night

There are only three actual articles. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete, better as a list in the article, not as a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2014 Winter Anime

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 2014 Winter Anime

The articles in this template are too loosely related to warrant a separate navbox to duplicate the purpose of Category:2014 anime and the article 2014 in anime. As far as I know, there is no precedent for having this sort of template where the only thing connecting these articles is that they just happened to be released in a certain 3-month period. In addition, a few of the guidelines given at WP:NAVBOX are not satisfied, particularly "The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article" (the only "mention" being that each of these articles is in Category:2014 anime), "The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent." (none of the articles refer to each other), and "You would want to list many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles." (this is what Category:2014 anime is for). So I do not believe we need templates like this in lieu of having to create other similar templates for other quarters of this year or previous years.  十  八  02:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CLN/WP:NENAN, WP:NOT a TV guide, we don't need to navigate what shows are on air right now, since we are not a TV guide. The article and category are enough for that. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 03:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The only other place I've seen templates like this are on wikia fan-websites, so I get the feeling that there may be some amount of anime fancruft behind this seemingly sensible looking template. Since Wikipedia already has categories as Juhachi mentioned, this kind of quarterly template is rather redundant. —KirtZ Message 21:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wish I could just speedy it. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Redundant navbox, this is why we have Category:2014 anime. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Redundant to Category: 2014 anime. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.