Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 January 8



Template:Infobox Referendum approved with map

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 13:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Infobox Referendum approved with map
 * Infobox Referendum pending with map
 * Infobox Referendum rejected with map
 * Infobox Referendum with detailed key
 * Referendum with map help

no longer needed after updates to infobox referendum. note, I replaced all of them while cleaning up errors, but can undo this change if there is consensus to do so. Frietjes (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete all as redundant to the updated infobox referendum.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Italian political party factions

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete or rather move and redirect to preserve history. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Italian political party factions

Unused. NSH002 (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Now it's used. Very old template: at least save its history by making it a redirect to another template. --Checco (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * delete or redirect to something appropriate. Frietjes (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Talent agencies

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 13:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Talent agencies

I don't see the value of this template compared to listing these agencies in a category. The terms "big four", "prominent", "major modelling", "prominent historical" are all amorphous, subject to person opinion, and really unable to be measured. It is all opinion on what belongs in which, and when they move from one group to another. To no value.

Further, I do not see any value to the template nor guidance on how or where it should be used, to the point it seems short on value. It doesn't provide good navigation, ie. grouping people who fulfilled a role, states in a country, etc. — billinghurst  sDrewth  10:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete, better served by a category. Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Inclusion is mostly POV/arbitrary.   Mbinebri   talk &larr; 15:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. While navigation is nice, the organization is original research.  --  Wikipedical (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vacansoleil-DCM riders

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Vacansoleil-DCM riders

Per here and here. Just like Agritubel and Team RadioShack in those discussions, Vacansoleil-DCM is now a defunct cycling team, and in that regards, the template is now redundant. Craig (talk)  00:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as per previous discussions; we don't use these for defunct teams. Severo (talk) 07:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.