Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 June 21



Template:Error:must not be substituted

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Error:must not be substituted

Orphaned, as it's been obsoleted by Module:Unsubst. Templates that shouldn't be substed can now un-subst themselves rather than needing to display an error telling the user to do it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment can this be moved to GitHub or something? The template system that uses this would be useful for other MediaWiki projects who don't necessarily use LUA. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, if you have somewhere to put it, then you can copy it there yourself now. But there's no need to keep it here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:15, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Which source code hubs accept wikicoded sources? Is there a MediaWiki wiki for MediaWiki admin-to-admin/user-to-user information? I'd like to know which ones can accept this (SourceForge? GitHub? ... )-- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Crosslink

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Crosslink

Per the CFD it's unclear what 'crosslink' pages are – it has no such meaning in English (1, 2) – and WP already has projects, templates and categories to connect together the content it seems to cover, i.e. lists, outlines, DAB pages, concept DABs. Barely used anyway, so whatever categorisation is it meant to be doing hasn't happened. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 13:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment if this is kept, it should be restricted to CONCEPTDAB pages. All other uses overlap with other processes (Outlines, Portals, Contents, Indices, WPBooks, Categories, Set Indexes, standard lists) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems like an abandoned idea. Also, since its an editor instruction ("change the link to point directly") it would belong on talk pages anyway, and I can't see it being useful there. -- Netoholic @ 06:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Achilles (band)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Achilles (band)

Fails WP:NENAN for not having five relevant links. The Banner talk 11:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom --Netoholic @ 06:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South Africa squad 1997 FIFA U20 World Cup

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC) This is a youth football tournament only. It's not notable. It's unnecessary to create a youth tournament navboxes. It must be delete per this discussion JackHoang (talk) 03:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * South Africa squad 1997 FIFA U20 World Cup
 * South Africa squad 2009 FIFA U-23 World Cup


 * delete youth squad templates are overkill. Frietjes (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Malaysia Squad 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup - Winner 1st Title and the other(s)
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC) This is regional tournament. It has no notability! These navbox should be deleted per this discussion. JackHoang (talk) 03:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Malaysia Squad 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup - Winner 1st Title
 * Malaysia Squad 2012 AFF Suzuki Cup


 * delete regional tournament squad templates are overkill. Frietjes (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nepal U-17 squad
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Nepal U-17 squad

No need to create the "current squad" navbox for a national team. And this is a youth team! JackHoang (talk) 03:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * delete youth squad templates are overkill. Frietjes (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:R.S.C. Anderlecht U-19 squad
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * R.S.C. Anderlecht U-19 squad

Youth team so the "current squad" navbox is very unnecessary! JackHoang (talk) 03:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Print-era thinking. Why is it unnecessary? Wikipedia isn't made of paper. Ayoopdog (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * delete, consensus is no navboxes for youth squads. 188.74.96.111 (talk) 21:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * delete youth squad templates are overkill. Frietjes (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.