Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 May 5



Template:Patriot Budapest MHL Games 2012–13

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Patriot Budapest MHL Games 2012–13

Content is double with the article Patriot Budapest. The Banner talk 22:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * merge and delete, single use template. Frietjes (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox airshow

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Infobox airshow

Only 65 transclusions. Redundant to infobox recurring event. Here's a. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * That doesn't address the "events" field. See Miramar Air Show and Oregon International Air Show examples of how that is used, as air shows are often not just what is going on in the sky. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed. See . Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Neon Jungle

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Neon Jungle

No aid in navigation as nearly all the links just point back to the topic article. The only directly related articles are the 3 songs. Interlinking is well established with or without the navbox. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 04:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * delete, songs are connected by chronology links. Frietjes (talk) 23:29, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NENAN.-- Laun  chba  ller  14:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox venue

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Infobox stadium into Infobox venue. Feel free to nominate Infobox theatre for merging with Infobox venue, if you think that should be merged as well. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Infobox venue

Redundant to Infobox theatre (or perhaps in some cases Infobox building; note also that Infobox stadium exists)). After replacement, should be kept as a redirect. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * checking the code, this is a fork of infobox stadium, so could be merged with that template. however, given the number of parameters that overlap the building template, I would say it would be better to just merge/replace it with infobox building. Frietjes (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm happy with any of those solutions, and a redirect accordingly. Should we merge 'Stadium into 'Building as well?  Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * possibly, but perhaps start by rewriting it as a wrapper. Frietjes (talk) 13:41, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * Delete - Infobox theatre can serve its purpose for articles on performance venues, and Infobox stadium can serve its purpose for articles on sporting venues. There is no need for Infobox theater and stadium to be merged like this, simply because there is a large difference between sporting and performance venues. RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 21:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and redir to the building template or some other alternative, whatever resolves the redundancy. .  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  02:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If anything, wouldn't it be better to merge IB theatre and IB stadium into Infobox venue? I'm sceptical about the potential for a merger with Infobox building, infobox stadium seems to be more similar to this template.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Fine by me.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  21:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * eh bien mon prince makes a good point: IB stadium & IB theatre & "niteclub" all have property descriptions that seem to fall into subsets of IB venue.Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 02:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, agree Infobox theatre, Infobox stadium and Infobox venue should be merged at some point. I also do not support merging these to Infobox building at this time. Zzyzx11 (talk) 21:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * Note, relisted due to the lack of consensus on where to merge it, although there is consensus to merge it with something. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge with Infobox theatre and/or Infobox stadium. Like eh bien mon prince, I'm not convinced about merging those with Infobox building, and instead prefer to keep that separate. There are a few incompatibilities there, like the "tenants" parameter on infobox stadium. A "tenant" of a stadium is not the same as a "tenant" in a hotel, apartment, or other type of building -- and thus prone to misuse if merged. And there was no consensus at Template talk:Infobox stadium to use anything differently. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * We needn't be bound by a low-traffic, four-year-old discussion. The matter can be re-opened, we could, for example, use the term "Sports teams" for those whose home venue is the stadium in question. It appears that the best solution would be for all these templates to be merged into Infobox building. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge with Infobox stadium. I would prefer that the reverse be true, however, this will do, IMO. <span style="font-family:Segoe UI, Sans; color:red;">Shawn <span style="font-family:Segoe UI, Sans; color:green;">Is <span style="font-family:Segoe UI, Sans; color:blue;">Here : Now in colors 05:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge Infobox theatre and Infobox stadium into Infobox venue. Seems the most sensible to me, they all sort of fall under that umbrella term. Note also this is often being used for some buildings such as a tavern or pub. &mdash; <b style="color:black;">MusikAnimal</b> <sup style="color:green;">talk 02:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.