Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 13



Template:ARB

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst all tranclusions and delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 02:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC) This template appears to be a block of text (prose) that is used in multiple articles. I don't think I have ever seen this sort of thing before, other than for tables/charts. If someone tries to make a change to it in one article, that change will go across all articles it's transcluded on, which I don't think is what we want. This should probably be substituted, and the template deleted. In my opinion. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ARB
 * Subst and delete per nom. Templates that add prose without serving an useful function should be deleted. --TL22 (talk) 14:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Songhoy Blues

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. BethNaught (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Has no bluelinks, serves no purpose whatsoever. GiantSnowman 17:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Songhoy Blues
 * delete, provides no navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uniautónoma FC squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. BethNaught (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Defunct club Brayan Jaimes (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Uniautónoma FC squad
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom, no need for a 'current' squad for a defunct club. GiantSnowman 17:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Maintaining a current squad template does not really make any sense if there is no current squad. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:La Academia Junior Indonesia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. BethNaught (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Recently created navbox. After removing multiple redlinks, links to incorrect pages and duplicate entries there are only 4 links remaining. The uncategorised template is only used in one article and that article is at AfD. Another article is the subject of a copyright investigation and could be deleted.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 12:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * La Academia Junior Indonesia
 * delete, we would only include this in the main article, so it provides no navigation which could not be provided with standard article links. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too short to be useful as a stand-alone navbox. - HyperGaruda (talk) 12:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 ITF Women's Circuit

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 21. Primefac (talk) 03:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC) WP:TOOEARLY, most of infos aren't available now. 333-blue 12:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 2016 ITF Women's Circuit
 * Keep. Circuit will start very soon, so WP:TOOEARLY does not apply.--Wolbo (talk) 12:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Userfy. This will eventually be useful, but it isn't right now. It serves no navigational purpose. ~ RobTalk 07:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SBN Luzon
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 21. Primefac (talk) 03:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * SBN Luzon
 * Delete. Useless navbox. Sixth of March 01:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).