Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 10



Template:WaynesburgAnatomicModel

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * WaynesburgAnatomicModel

We have ample amounts of images of anatomy on WP. We shouldn't be linking to a relatively arbitrary service in our "external links" section unless it is particularly meritorious, particularly if that place is a for-profit institution. In addition this template has such as small number of uses that, if linked, a simple link (rather than a custom template) should suffice Tom (LT) (talk) 22:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons above. BakerStMD T&#124;C 16:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:LinkBCif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, no objections Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * LinkBCif

Delete, per WT:YEARS. Orphaned (by me) about 1-1/2 months ago, and it's not clear it ever worked properly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tennis events 4

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Previously discussed and closed as Merge. (Previous discussion) (non-admin closure) —PC-XT+ 01:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Tennis events 4
 * Tennis events 2

Propose merging Template:Tennis events 4 with Template:Tennis events 2.

Only for a few articles. 333-blue 14:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:Tennis events 4 to Template:Tennis events 2.--333-blue 14:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tennis events 3

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Previously discussed and closed as Merge. (Previous discussion) (non-admin closure) —PC-XT+ 01:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Tennis events 3
 * Tennis events

Propose merging Template:Tennis events 3 with Template:Tennis events.

Only for a few articles. 333-blue 14:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:Tennis events 3 to Template:Tennis events 1.--333-blue 14:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: Tennis events 1 redirects to Tennis events. 333-blue, do you mean to propose that all these Tennis events (1-4) templates be merged to one? We can merge the discussions, if that is the case. —PC-XT+ 00:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * no, I don't think it's a good idea, because of Tennis events is for men-women-tournament, Tennis events 2 is for men/women-tournament. Anyway, they use in different places and a lot of articles use Tennis events and Tennis events 2.--333-blue 01:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, this merge was already discussed on March 30, last year, with the decision to merge, so I'm going to close this. —PC-XT+ 01:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.