Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 May 12



Template:JR West stations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * JR West stations

Unused and redundant to STN. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 15:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete along with the related JR West color and JR West lines which are also unused. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GZMTR stations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * GZMTR stations

Unused and redundant to STN. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 15:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What? Do you know what this is for? It is redundant to GZM stations. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Why does Station, or any of its derivatives, exist? All they do is obfuscate regular wikilinks: . Alakzi (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Related templates suffixed with lines, stations and color are all read by succession templates. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The linking function is secondary and the person who added the standard documentation did not fully understand the function and relationship. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd have raised no objections if they were meta-templates, but these are apparently used in articles. Take a look at the lede of Ealing Broadway station, for example - absurd. Alakzi (talk) 16:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * We are talking about different fruit, and this is not the place to discuss those type of templates. As I said above, a series of templates named in a specific way like this one relate to succession templates. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The nominator's rationale was "redundant to STN", which is a wrapper of Station. I was commenting on that. Alakzi (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Exactly. That is not the template nominated for deletion. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - unused and not needed. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.