Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 May 20



Template:RollbackWait

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * RollbackWait

This template is never used, and has absolutely no reason to be used. It doesn't follow current PERM policies. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 18:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Alakzi (talk) 01:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NYCS-bull-flex

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 June 11. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NYCS-bull-small

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 00:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * NYCS-bull-small
 * Rail-interchange

Propose merging Template:NYCS-bull-small with Template:Rail-interchange.

Rail-interchange has nearly all of NYCS-bull-small's features (except  and , which can trivially be added). There isn't really a need to have two different templates for this. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 08:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:NYCS-bull-small is specifically for New York City Subway services, so massive numbers of articles would have to be changed if these articles were to use Template:Rail-interchange. I support this in theory, but it is very tedious. Epic Genius (talk) ± 12:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. Initially it can be replaced with  until the replacement is finished. Useddenim (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Question - Can Template:Rail-interchange truly live without Template:NYCS-bull-small? I also see some templates that display some NYC Subway bullets in connections parameters of such infoboxes as Grand Central Terminal, Pennsylvania Station (New York City), Long Island City (LIRR station), Harlem–125th Street (Metro-North station), and others. How will they be affected by the change once they're implemented? Also, if a merge is suitable, has the nom considered merging Template:NYCS-bull-small into Template:NYCS time 2? -User:DanTD (talk) 01:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The bullets will be unaffected. NYCS time 2 already uses NYCS-bull-small for bullets. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 11:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Support as per Jc86035. Also, if there are concerns about replacing it in a large number of articles, aren't there bots that help with that sort of thing? -- Natural  R X 15:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2014 Commonwealth Games table tennis mixed doubles bronze

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2014 Commonwealth Games table tennis mixed doubles bronze

Unused template, appears to have been a test by a user that was never completed or needed. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's rationale: unused, unloved and incomplete. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 11:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TT

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * TT

Looks like a test template, was never used except in the other unused test template 2014 Commonwealth Games table tennis mixed doubles bronze. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Convert to a wrapper for &lt;tt&gt;  for typewriter text font -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I had considered boldly doing this, but remembered that  is obsolete in HTML, and its uses are being phased out. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 06:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It can instead redirect to mono, which does the same thing as the obsolete tag but with CSS styling. I think, though, that it is encouraged to create a completely new template with the same name only after the old page is deleted in cases like this. SiBr4 (talk) 17:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with that -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as test/redundant. Alakzi (talk) 01:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.