Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 29



Template:2013 Colonial Athletic Association men's soccer navbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 21:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC) WP:EXISTING -- It is only used in the season article and the links listed do not have an article. It's been two years and the season team articles have not been created. Corkythe hornetfan  20:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 2013 Colonial Athletic Association men's soccer navbox
 * Delete per nom. Gparyani (talk) 23:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - This navbox is 100% red links and used on a single article. Delete with extreme
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spam-warn

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was at Templates for discussion/Log/2015 October 7. Gparyani (talk) 02:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Spam-warn with Template:Db-spam-notice.
 * Spam-warn
 * Db-spam-notice

Don't see why there is a need for this separate template, as Template:Db-spam-notice also exists for the exact same criterion (generic G11). The latter template is better, as it uses the global Template:Db-notice unlike the former, and the latter is more common, as it is used by Twinkle. Gparyani (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete the former per nominator. Spam-warn contains some meaningful text not mentioned inn Db-spam-notice, which would warrant merging, but it can't work because Spam-warn doesn't use the default db-notice template, while Db-spam-notice does. --TL22 (talk) 20:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gparyani (talk) 04:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gparyani (talk) 19:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Christianity in Kerala

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep, support here for reduction in size/scope, which has been carried out. Any remaining concerns about POV or content can be discussed elsewhere. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC) This template, is far, far, far too long, and WP:TNT looks like the best way to go. I thought about pruning, but there really doesn't seem much worth keeping - we will need some list articles first (like List of churches in Kerala), and then have a template that links to them. StAnselm (talk) 08:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Christianity in Kerala
 * Christianity has a profound impact on Kerala's making and thought a template covering all the aspects would help. But if smaller templates are a better way forward, let's do away with this one and start afresh. We will wait for comments from others.--jojo@nthony (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Support. It fails WP:NAVBOX, because articles listed should refer to each other to a certain extent. This is unwieldy for a single navbox. Split it up into different navboxes, I'd say, based upon denomination. --Soetermans. T / C 11:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Suggest the template is spilt up into Churches of Kerala, covering the churches and pilgrim centres and Christianity in Kerala to include the rest, eliminating, of course, the schools. That way, we can avoid WP:TNT and have smaller templates covering the subject. If a consensus is reached here, I can work on that. --jojo@nthony (talk) 07:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I have split up the template into two and the drafts are in my sandbox.--jojo@nthony (talk) 11:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there any other template on wikipedia that attempts to list all the notable clergy of a particular area? StAnselm (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Not that I know of. But they are part of the topic and their notability is, in a way, established by the acceptance of the article. Believe they should be a part of the template.--jojo@nthony (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * ,   - If we agree on split up of the template into two, I could have gone ahead with it. Please respond.--jojo@nthony (talk) 11:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * No, both are far to big and unwieldy. There is a precedent for the churches template with Template:Churches in Cheshire, but I think it would be better to go for a smaller region, or go by denomination. The general template should be something like Template:Christianity in Australia or Template:Christianity in Sweden (remembering that both have a smaller population than Kerala!) StAnselm (talk) 18:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * So I guess all that means I would support a template with just "denominations" and "Religious organizations", with possibly some "related articles". StAnselm (talk) 18:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The reality of Australia and Sweden are different from Kerala in more ways than one, considering demographics, nature of denominations, sociological and economic impact of religion so on and so forth. I feel the Kerala reality will not allow a short template (excluding the seats of power from the template would be unjust, I believe). WP:NAVBOX does not exclude longer templates as long as the articles covered by the templates bind each other under a common relevant theme. Finally, the idea is only to provide easy navigation. Please do not take this as an intention on my part to precipitate an argument, on the contrary, felt a comprehensive template would do better. The Template:Churches of Kerala can be divided according to denominations, which would make it easier for navigation.--jojo@nthony (talk) 05:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Who says they are "seats of power", anyway? That strikes me as a POVish title. But AFAIK individual dioceses are not usually listed in the national or state Christianity template. StAnselm (talk) 07:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, the title looks POVish but the Kerala reality supports it. Just as an aside: In Kerala, if a couple wants to get married the Christian way, attending a pre-marital course and successful passing of an informal test are mandatory. Almost all the denominations follow this, except a few new age churches, and that is how the Church enforces its authority over the followers. The same holds true for births, communions and burials. Of course, people have the freedom to go the civil way, but then that is outside the purview of a discussion on Christianity. Anyway, I will remove the Seats of Power", Canonized people and Notable clergy sections so that we may hold the template. If a wider discussion, at a later stage, evolves the addition of these sections, we will look at it then. Thanks for your comments. Cheers!!--jojo@nthony (talk) 11:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).