Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 30



Template:Vojko Herksel Cup seasons

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Redirect to Oct 19. Redirects were reverted, so discussion should continue. Primefac (talk) 03:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC) I just redirected all the articles on this template, so it's obsolete Pokerkiller (talk) 22:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Vojko Herksel Cup seasons
 * delete, navigates nothing. Frietjes (talk) 16:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trailer sailers and Trailer yachts worldwide

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relist at Oct 28. Primefac (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC) Broad and unclear scope. See also Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 20. Smartskaft (talk) 09:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Trailer sailers and Trailer yachts worldwide


 * Keep There is clear use of the template. It has value and can co-exist peacefully with any list or category fulfilling a similar function. Fiddle   Faddle  09:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sailing dinghies and skiffs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC) Broad and unclear scope. See also Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 20. Smartskaft (talk) 09:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sailing dinghies and skiffs


 * Keep There is clear use of the template. It has value and can co-exist peacefully with any list or category fulfilling a similar function. Fiddle   Faddle  09:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep More clearer to the Olympic version but this is not to say the Olympic template is bad, thus making this template necessary. Donnie Park (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:International dinghies

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge as proposed. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 07:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC) Propose merging Template:International dinghies and Template:International keelboats with Template:Classes of the International Sailing Federation.
 * International dinghies
 * International keelboats
 * Classes of the International Sailing Federation

Redundant to Template:Classes of the International Sailing Federation. Smartskaft (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Support merge per nom Fiddle   Faddle  09:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Support merge, I'm the original author of International dinghies. Etnoy (talk) 11:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Smashing Pumpkins

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Replace with WP Alt Music template and appropriate parameters. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC) This template is just a hard-coded instance of Template:WikiProject Alternative music with the pumpkins-taskforce parameter set to yes (used in 10 pages out of the 114 total in the taskforce. There is no active project at WikiProject Alternative music/The Smashing Pumpkins any longer. However it doesn't pass through all the proper classes so pages like Category talk:A-Class Smashing Pumpkins articles show up as Category:NA-Class Alternative music articles rather than Category:Category-Class Alternative music articles. It would be better to stubst the uses of this template with the actual template rather than have separate versions requiring double the maintenance checking. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Smashing Pumpkins
 * Delete convenience wrapper of that saves a little wikicode - that is to say,   whilst exactly equivalent to   is essentially equivalent to   so the actual saving is the single parameter yes As regards unrecognised classes, this is because  has subpage, which brings  into play, which adds certain classes (file/book/draft/category/disambiguation/template/project) to the default set (fa/a/ga/b/c/start/stub/fl/list/na), it also removes list-class.  doesn't have a corresponding  so it sets standard which is a bit of a cop-out. -- Red rose64 (talk) 08:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - There's hardly anyone who maintains their related articles anymore beyond myself, let alone enough people to warrant any sort of WikiProject on them... Sergecross73   msg me  12:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MMMeadowsSeriesUnderInfoBox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 20:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC) redundant to Mountain Meadows massacre. we don't need both a sidebar and a navbox in the same article. Frietjes (talk) 17:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * MMMeadowsSeriesUnderInfoBox

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 00:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: one of the two needs to go. According to WP:SIDEBAR, "The collection of articles in a sidebar template should be fairly tightly related", so I think it's better that the navbox is kept and the sidebar goes. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 19:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: the logic is sound. As a sidebar, I used to edit this article frequently. There used to be weeks long edit wars, RfC's and ArbCom bans over changing one word in the lead of this article. This has been listed for weeks and I didn't even notice. Did we all grow up? or just get tired of fighting ;). Dave (talk) 03:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).