Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 10



Template:Rough translation

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Rough translation with Template:Cleanup translation.
 * Rough translation
 * Cleanup translation

Two templates that appear to have exactly the same purpose. P p p er y (talk) 23:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * oppose, no demonstration of a merged template. Frietjes (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Um,, why is it necessary to demonstrate the merged template before starting a discussion about whether to merge? P p p er y  (talk) 13:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Um, you are proposing the merge the templates but have not stated how they will be merged. hence, it is impossible to know what you are proposing. Frietjes (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb team Nasr Mining FC

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Unused. Ben5218 (talk) 19:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Fb team Nasr Mining FC
 * delete, we should be able to speedy delete this per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb team El Geish

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Useless. There's already a template for this club (Template:Fb team Tala'ea El Gaish). A delete or a redirect to the other template could work. Ben5218 (talk) 19:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Fb team El Geish
 * delete or redirect Frietjes (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HK-MTR timetable

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Am creator; not sure if timetable information is necessary in station articles. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 11:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * HK-MTR timetable
 * Jc86035, if you're convinced that we should delete this, you can tag the template with &lt;noinclude>db-g7</noinclude&gt; (yes, use the noincludes, so it doesn't show up in transclusions). Do you just want it to be deleted, or do you prefer to get opinions from other people? If so, please say that, so that nobody takes this nomination as reason for a WP:G7 deletion.  Nyttend (talk) 01:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd like to get opinions from other people, as I'm not actually sure if there's a policy allowing or disallowing timetables. The template also has a few other problems: the MTRC decided to remove the timetables from their website. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 03:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure; thanks for making your intentions explicit. Nyttend (talk) 04:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NOTTIMETABLE, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTGUIDE. -- Red rose64 (talk) 14:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's not a policy per se, but various essays point against this level of detail in station articles. Mackensen (talk) 15:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per Redrose....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPad Mini models
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Template has already been merged with Template:iPad models, no-longer necessary as all articles are included in the broader Category:IPad, not the redundant Category:IPad Mini. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * iPad Mini models
 * delete, redundant. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archive banner/testcases
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC) This is a procedural nomination. MrLinkinPark333 nominated these template subpages for speedy deletion, considering them test pages, but I declined the speedies, saying "If I understand rightly, this serves as a kind of example page; probably shouldn't be deleted". Figured I might as well bring them here, because it's possible that I misunderstood something. No point in asking Gadget850, the creator, because he hasn't made any edits since retiring over a year ago. Nyttend (talk) 03:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Archive banner/testcases/Archive 1
 * Archive banner/testcases/Archive index
 * Archive banner/testcases/Archive 2009
 * Archive banner/testcases/Archive 2008
 * Archive banner/testcases/Archive 2
 * Keep and perhaps add an explanation on the pages that they're used at Template:Archive banner/testcases as part of testcases. — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 04:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - If I mistakened testcases as test pages, I'm fine if these templates are kept. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 13:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The rosary
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC) This is a navbox footer that is transcluded onto the same pages of the Rosary sidebar template. It looks like it was forked out of the "Practices" subheader of that sidebar some years ago, but I don't know why we need both on the same pages. MSJapan (talk) 00:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The rosary
 * Delete, but don't feel too strongly. (I was semi-involved in reporting some related templates being moved around) — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 04:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * delete, although I prefer the compactness of the navbox vs the sidebar, this is clear duplication and the sidebar appears to have more links. Frietjes (talk) 13:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).