Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 18



Template:Prominent Musicians With the University of California Jazz Ensembles

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. delldot  &nabla;.  01:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Used on two articles, no aid to navigation Aloneinthewild (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Prominent Musicians With the University of California Jazz Ensembles


 * Delete. Fails WP:TG generally as well as WP:NAVBOX 4. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 00:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb team Abano

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 28. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC) unused template, non-professional club. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Fb team Abano
 * Fb team Albalonga
 * Fb team Viterbese Castrense
 * Fb team Virtus Bergamo
 * Fb team Ripa La Fenadora
 * Fb team ArzignanoChiampo
 * Fb team Union ArzignanoChiampo
 * Fb team Sporting Bellinzago
 * Fb team Sondrio
 * Fb team Roccella
 * Fb team Reggio Calabria
 * Fb team Pro Settimo & Eureka
 * Fb team Ponsacco
 * Fb team Palmese
 * Fb team OltrepoVoghera
 * Fb team Nuorese
 * Fb team Nerostellati Frattese
 * Fb team Luparense San Paolo
 * Fb team Leonfortese
 * Fb team Gragnano
 * Fb team Fontanafredda
 * Fb team Delta Rovigo
 * Fb team Città di Castello
 * Fb team Ciserano
 * Fb team Ciliverghe Mazzano
 * Fb team Castelfidardo
 * Fb team Avezzano
 * Fb team Argentina
 * Fb team Altovicentino
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marvel Video Games

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 28. (non-admin closure). Primefac (talk) 04:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Subject of template is Marvel video games, which is a too broad for a subject. There's also List of video games based on Marvel Comics and Category: Video games based on Marvel Comics. There's for Spider-Man,  for the X-Men and Wolverine. Soetermans. T / C 12:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Marvel Video Games
 * There's also, , , , , etc. --Soetermans. T / C 16:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge as appropriate to the series-specific templates. Where that's not possible (e.g. the crossovers) consider a new template e.g. Marvel crossovers. --Izno (talk) 14:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 28. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Unused templates and redundant with generic template present at Template:Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa 1
 * Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa 2
 * Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa 3
 * Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa 4
 * Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa 5
 * Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa 6
 * Delete as apparently unused and redundant —PC-XT+ 09:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Help out

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:11, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Seems to be a test edit by a new user. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 09:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Help out
 * Delete and take care of transclusion at User talk:Jwinder47. Someone doing a test on a friend's page? —PC-XT+ 09:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, speeds delete per WP:G2. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 01:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Joseph Wren Trophy

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Joseph Wren Memorial Trophy has been deleted at AfD so this navbox now fails criterion #4 of WP:NAVBOX: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". WP:NENAN too. Jenks24 (talk) 07:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Joseph Wren Trophy
 * Keep: Many of the navboxes to do with sport don't have a an article of the direct subject of the template, for example: league top goalscorer templates, captains of a club templates, season&year templates etc. If needed I can also link examples, but I feel like this is well known. --SuperJew (talk) 19:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are far too many AFL navboxes that aren't needed, although I would personally nominate for deletion the excessive Adelaide, Brisbane, and Fremantle ones ahead of this, it probably isn't necessary due to Jenks24's statement. There are articles for leading goalkickers for every team and the league (example: List of Adelaide Football Club leading goalkickers and Template:Adelaide leading goalkickers; Coleman Medal and Template:AFL Coleman Medallists), captains of clubs (example: List of Adelaide Football Club captains and Template:Adelaide Football Club captains), coaches of all clubs (example: List of Adelaide Football Club coaches and Template:Adelaide Football Club coaches), and there are barely any solely season navboxes as it is, but all have articles, so they all meet criterion 4 of WP:NAVBOX, whereas the above nomination doesn't. Although this is a B&F award, it isn't the clubs' main/senior B&F award, for example, I would be in favour of keeping Template:P.T. Morton Medal as that is the clubs' senior B&F award even though it's not an AFL club. I've personally tried to tidy up articles/categories/templates etc. that fall under the AFL during the off-season and there's a lot of things that aren't needed. Flickerd (talk) 23:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is very much similar to WP:G8 (Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page). §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:13, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject of this navbox is a team-level award of dubious notability, and the stand-alone article/list for the subject has been deleted at AfD. Therefore, the navbox fails WP:NAVBOX criterion no. 4.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Harry Collier Trophy

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Harry Collier Trophy has been deleted at AfD so this navbox now fails criterion #4 of WP:NAVBOX: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". WP:NENAN too. Jenks24 (talk) 07:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Harry Collier Trophy
 * Keep: Many of the navboxes to do with sport don't have a an article of the direct subject of the template, for example: league top goalscorer templates, captains of a club templates, season&year templates etc. If needed I can also link examples, but I feel like this is well known. --SuperJew (talk) 19:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are far too many AFL navboxes that aren't needed, although I would personally nominate for deletion the excessive Adelaide, Brisbane, and Fremantle ones ahead of this, it probably isn't necessary due to Jenks24's statement. There are articles for leading goalkickers for every team and the league (example: List of Adelaide Football Club leading goalkickers and Template:Adelaide leading goalkickers; Coleman Medal and Template:AFL Coleman Medallists), captains of clubs (example: List of Adelaide Football Club captains and Template:Adelaide Football Club captains), coaches of all clubs (example: List of Adelaide Football Club coaches and Template:Adelaide Football Club coaches) and there are barely any solely season navboxes as it is, but all have articles, so they all meet criterion 4 of WP:NAVBOX, whereas the above nomination doesn't. I've personally tried to tidy up articles/categories/templates etc. that fall under the AFL during the off-season and there's a lot of things that aren't needed. Flickerd (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is very much similar to WP:G8 (Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page). §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject of this navbox is a team-level award of dubious notability, and the stand-alone article/list for the subject has been deleted at AfD. Therefore, the navbox fails WP:NAVBOX criterion no. 4.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox recordlabel

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Broken attempt to create hardcoded instance of some infobox —teb728 t c 01:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Infobox recordlabel
 * Speedy-delete as a test edit —PC-XT+ 05:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).