Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 20



Template:Spirit (Leona Lewis album) track listing

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Per consensus at Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 19 and other similar TFD's, these types of templates are redundant when songs templates already exist (or artist template in cases where songs do not have their own templates) and should be deleted. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Spirit (Leona Lewis album) track listing
 * delete, redundant navigation per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gold Award templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Gold Award for Best Actor
 * Gold Award for Best Actress
 * Gold Award for Best Anchor
 * Gold Award for Best Child Artiste
 * Gold Award for Best Comic Actor
 * Gold Award for Best Comic Actress
 * Gold Award for Best Female Debut
 * Gold Award for Best Male Debut
 * Gold Award for Best Negative Actor
 * Gold Award for Best Negative Actress
 * Gold Award for Best Onscreen Jodi
 * Gold Award for Best Supporting Actor
 * Gold Award for Best Supporting Actress
 * Gold Award for Best TV Show
 * Gold Award for Face of the Year
 * Gold Award for Most Fit Actor
 * Gold Award for Most Fit Actress
 * Gold Award for Stellar Performer

Unsourced award templates failing WP:NAVBOX. These awards don't even have their individual pages to see for sourcing and they are spamming many articles across Wikipedia. Also, have been created by various socks but have been edited by many IPs later on, which could be operated by sock master, but I assume do not qualify under speedy criteria of blocked user creations. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Specifically fails guideline #4 of WP:NAVBOX: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template. However, there are none for the individual awards and without such articles, we cannot reliably source the information inside the templates. - HyperGaruda (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete : Per Dharmadhyaksha. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 05:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ibrahim

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 4. Primefac (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

The family list is something for an infobox, the remaining three links can easily be put in a "See also" section, if not in the main text itself. Of those three, the link to Maqām Ibrāhīm redirects to tiny subsection in Petrosomatoglyph, leaving actually only two meaningful links. HyperGaruda (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ibrahim
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb team Springwood FC

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 4. Primefac (talk) 23:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Unused, seems to have been created in error JMHamo (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Fb team Springwood FC
 * Fb team Roosters FC
 * Fb team Luddenham United
 * Fb team Hakoah FC
 * Fb team Fairfield Wanderers
 * Fb team Chopin Park Rams
 * Fb team Belmore Hercules
 * Fb team Bathurst 75
 * Fb team Balmain SC
 * delete, I added some from the same category after fixing the issue [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2011_Football_NSW_season&type=revision&diff=698835023&oldid=697811258 here]. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't understand why the above changes had to occur? - J man708 (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, these weren't unused at the time of creation. Frietjes' edit had them taken out, as to "avoid using new fb team templates, which are deprecated". I know this isn't going to win me any friends, but I build a LOT of football pages and find this system a million times more user-friendly than the new system. I'll avoid using the new system as much as possible, especially as other football season pages prior to this new system utilise these "fb templates" aswell. - J man708 (talk) 02:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 04:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brigada Mass Media Corporation
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now. No prejudice against renomination if this template drops back below the threshold of usefulness. BethNaught (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC) No useful navigation. Most links are to a single article. Sixth of March 07:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Brigada Mass Media Corporation
 * Delete -- only links two articles. --Izno (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 04:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Useless if it only links to two articles (4 out of 5 links lead to the same page). Might be recreated in the future if there are articles for each entry. - HyperGaruda (talk) 09:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment This template is transcluded on 3 pages it doesn't link: —PC-XT+ 11:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 11:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Swap to keep per PC-XT; the one thing I didn't check. The transclusions appear to be legitimate. The articles are kind of rough, which leads me to believe that this template might find itself with few-enough links in the future, so no prejudice against a renomination at that time. --Izno (talk) 12:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep after the reworking. - HyperGaruda (talk) 10:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Englishmen with 100 or more ODI caps
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 4. Primefac (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Englishmen with 100 or more ODI caps
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:White nationalism
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Feb 4. Primefac (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * White nationalism
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).