Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 13



Template:PD-banknote

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Unused/no transclusions, redundant to   F ASTILY   10:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * PD-banknote
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman/2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) 0 transclusions. Functionality has been completely superceded by Template:Roman. — Andy W. ( talk  · ctb) 06:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Roman/2
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Motorola microcontrollers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge, why not? If there is a problem feel free to let me know and I can reopen this discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Motorola microcontrollers with Template:Motorola processors.
 * Motorola microcontrollers
 * Motorola processors

One template can handle all the stuff currently divided between the two templates; and there already seems to be some overlap. Template talk:Motorola microcontrollers also suggest merging. DavidCary (talk) 02:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 02:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CC-by-3.0-Works

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Unused, no transclusions, redundant to   F ASTILY   00:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * CC-by-3.0-Works
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Publication officielle

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Unused file license template, and likely based on an incorrect interpretation of copyright. See also: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Publication officielle  F ASTILY   00:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Publication officielle
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-status
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Unused/no transclusions, redundant to, and overly complicated/difficult to use  F ASTILY   00:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * PD-status
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-script
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) Unused/no transclusions, redundant to   F ASTILY   00:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * PD-script
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).