Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 27



Template:Pending changes table (expanded)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 July 8. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Pending changes table (expanded)
 * Pending changes blocks
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rajput class destroyers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac (talk) 03:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC) The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate single line template for just five ships. KC Velaga ☚╣✉╠☛  12:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Rajput class destroyers
 * Keep - standard for every ship class, shows which class comes before and after, and is higher quality than Template:Destroyers of the Indian Navy. Derekbridges (talk) 18:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Delhi class destroyers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac (talk) 03:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC) The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate template for just three ships. KC Velaga ☚╣✉╠☛  12:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delhi class destroyers
 * Keep - standard for every ship class, shows which class comes before and after, and is higher quality than Template:Destroyers of the Indian Navy. Derekbridges (talk) 18:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kolkata-class destroyers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to July 7. Primefac (talk) 03:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC) The class is covered in the template Destroyers of the Indian Navy. I think there is no need of separate template for just three ships. KC Velaga ☚╣✉╠☛  12:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Kolkata-class destroyers
 * Keep - standard for every ship class, shows which class comes before and after, and is higher quality than Template:Destroyers of the Indian Navy. Derekbridges (talk) 18:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC) This navbox does not contain any links that the main article does not already contain, and thus does not serve any useful purpose. Even if all the redlinks were turned blue, they could easily be incorporated into the infobox. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Temperature extremes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 July 8. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Temperature extremes
 * WikiProject Meteorology
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).