Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 May 23



Template:Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 23:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC) Contains mostly of unlinked text and links to other articles in which the template cannot be transcluded. Sixth of March 23:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Secondary schools in Hungary

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 14:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC) This template needs to be divided into multiple such templates by region. Listing all senior high schools in Hungary in a single template would be too much.
 * Secondary schools in Hungary

IMO the end result should be one template per Hungarian county (with Budapest having its own such template) or one per Hungarian region.

WhisperToMe (talk) 03:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I hope this is the right place for discussion. As I commented on WhisperToMe talk page, I do not have strong opinion on it. In ideal situation (where there are articles about all major schools in Hungary) it would be the only rational option. However, once I was making this Template I noticed that there is not to much articles on this topic so I decided to put them all together, and to include only schools that have articles on English Wikipedia. With more templates we will have much more red links. Of course, it will give the reader information on all high school, but I avoided it back than from aesthetic point of view. My only proposal is that if you decide to make change, instead of deleting current template, you move it to Template:High Schools in Budapest and adapt it for this narrower use.--MirkoS18 (talk) 13:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: That would be a great idea. Moving this template to Budapest, and then detaching the schools not in Budapest and giving them their own templates. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 19:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ RobTalk 12:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Slospeak Records

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 14:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion. See Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28 for previous discussions regarding roster, catalogues by the same reasoning. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Slospeak Records
 * delete, per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 02:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, What precedent? Exactly, no precedent, so lets develop one, please.The Cross Bearer (talk &#124; contribs) 02:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The precedent set at the linked discussion above in which multiple record label navboxes were deleted through consensus. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:La Salette Schools

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 14:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Does not provide useful navigation; navigates only three articles. Sixth of March 07:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * La Salette Schools
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Philippine TV navboxes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 14:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC) These templates do not provide useful navigation (same reason of mine in the previous discussion). Renominated due to lack of consensus there. Sixth of March 06:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Batangas City TV
 * Dagupan City TV
 * Pampanga TV
 * Puerto Princessa City TV
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boracay FM

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 14:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Does not provide useful navigation; navigates only three articles. Sixth of March 05:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Boracay FM
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).