Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 May 5



Template:Succisa

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Neelix species template with only 3 links. Legacypac (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC) I've removed all transclusions. Legacypac (talk) 21:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Succisa
 * Delete Incomplete and misleading, only lists a handful of Succisa species, would be a sea of red links if complete. Plantdrew (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per . All these Neelix species templates should be speedily deleted. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Manihot

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC) Neelix species template like others up for deletion Legacypac (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Manihot
 * Delete Incomplete and misleading, only lists 4 of 109 Manihot species, would be a sea of red links if complete. Plantdrew (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per . All these Neelix species templates should be speedily deleted. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ramalina

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure) . ~ RobTalk 02:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Neelix species template like the others supported for deletion. Not helpful. Legacypac (talk) 19:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ramalina
 * Delete Incomplete and misleading, only lists a handful of Ramalina species, would be a sea of red links if complete. Plantdrew (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per . All these Neelix species templates should be speedily deleted. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:M-28

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure) . ~ RobTalk 02:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Neelix template related to a highway. Appears unused. Legacypac (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * M-28
 * Delete—these shorts of templates have been deprecated over time, and this one is unused because I removed it from all of the articles based on those past precedents.  Imzadi 1979  →   19:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Plantdrew (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Deprecated template.  Dough   4872   20:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Leucopogon

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure) . ~ RobTalk 02:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Neelix species nav box. Not helpful. Legacypac (talk) 19:22, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Leucopogon
 * Delete. Incomplete and misleading, only list about half of Leucopogon species. Plantdrew (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per . All these Neelix species templates should be speedily deleted. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kaempferia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Unused template by Neelix. Legacypac (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Kaempferia
 * Delete. Unused, misleading (only list 4 of 34 Kaempferia species). 16:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per . All these Neelix species templates should be speedily deleted. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chris Haw

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 03:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Neelix Template for one of his favorate authors. Links only three things making it not very helpful. Legacypac (talk) 08:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Chris Haw
 * Delete, doesn't seem to be useful. Plantdrew (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SPXS

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 03:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC) No useful navigation. Sixth of March 04:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * SPXS
 * Delete per nom. Tangentially related topics, better in an infobox, not highly related topics -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 07:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Champ Lui Pio

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 03:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC) No useful navigation. Sixth of March 04:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Champ Lui Pio
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iowa statewide elected officials

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC) unused and not particularly helpful for navigation ~ RobTalk 03:12, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Iowa statewide elected officials
 * weak delete, not really needed, the offices are already linked in Current Iowa statewide political officials Frietjes (talk) 17:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LRT route

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 03:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Needlesly complex single-use template(s). All three sub-pages have been given standardized names and are now transcluded directly. Useddenim (talk) 00:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * LRT route
 * LRT route/Bukit Panjang
 * LRT route/Sengkang
 * LRT route/Punggol


 * Absolute deleteKevon kevono (talk) 20:51, 7 May 2016 (UTC) (What the hell is UTC?) 13:51 (PT)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).