Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 2



Template:Pink Grand Prix: 1998

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Pink Grand Prix: 1998
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:April Fools/April Fools/April Fools/April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Blank, unused templates (except on eachother). If someone wants to transclude the list of April Fools jokes, the proper method would be LST. P p p er y 13:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * April Fools/April Fools/April Fools/April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017
 * April Fools/April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017
 * I've deleted both pages per WP:CSD; author blanked one, and (sort of) tried to MFD the other on the 1st. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pioneer Football League rivalry navbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 13:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Pioneer Football League rivalry navbox
 * Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the military of allies of Nazi Germany

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC) The template is redundant to the existing article List of foreign recipients of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross and is thus unneeded.
 * Knight's Cross recipients in the military of allies of Nazi Germany

In addition, the subjects are not related apart from having received the same award from Nazi Germany during World War II, and the template is not useful for navigation. A template on the U-boat recipients has been deleted in the past, in part because the List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients of the U-boat service exists. See TfD discussion:


 * TfD: Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients of the U-boat service.

This is a similar case. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Redundant. Kierzek (talk) 22:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 95th ID

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Insufficient navigation. After the red links have been removed and articles on nn subjects redirected to alphabetical lists, only two blue-linked entries remain.
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 95th ID

Per the recent discussion (Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross winners), it's highly unlikely that the removed subjects would be considered notable in the future and the template is not needed.

Many similar templates have been deleted; please see, for example:
 * TfD: Knight's Cross recipients of the 294th ID.


 * K.e.coffman (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of KG 6

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Insufficient navigation. After the red links have been removed and articles on nn subjects redirected to alphabetical lists, only one entry (the first one) is an actual article. The other three blue-linked articles are redirects to a list.
 * Knight's Cross recipients of KG 6

Per the recent discussion (Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross winners), it's highly unlikely that the removed subjects would be considered notable in the future and the template is not needed.

Many similar templates have been deleted; please see, for example:
 * TfD: Knight's Cross recipients of the 294th ID.


 * K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Medical personnel recipients of the Knight's Cross

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Insufficient navigation. After the red links have been removed and articles on nn subjects redirected to alphabetical lists, only one entry (the first one) is an actual article. The other three blue-linked articles are redirects to a list.
 * Medical personnel recipients of the Knight's Cross

Per the recent discussion (Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross winners), it's highly unlikely that the removed subjects would be considered notable in the future and the template is not needed.

Many similar templates have been deleted; please see, for example:
 * TfD: Knight's Cross recipients of the 294th ID.


 * K.e.coffman (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transreq

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 05:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Redundant to expand language. KMF (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Transreq
 * Redirect to expand language as a valid template redirect. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).