Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 17



Template:The Vietnam Veterans

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  04:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC) Only one related article in addition to the main article, which already link to each other without need of the navbox. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The Vietnam Veterans
 * delete, the two articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * delete not important--AlfaRocket (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Talk header

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. This is clearly not going to be deleted. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC) I can't understand what purpose this is supposed to serve. This is transcluded on over 300,000 talk pages. If it's supposed to be a more-or-less universal guideline, then just make it a part of the interface of the site (a kind of universal Editnotice) by editing the appropriate bit in the MediaWiki namespace. If it's supposed to be applied to articles which we think will somehow be more frequented by newcomers or which is more prone to back-and-forth bickering, then a more specific template would be appropriate and certainly not require hundreds of thousands of transclusions (e.g. Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement). See a page like Talk:Scientology where this is just swallowed up in a sea of notices. The notification creep is only exacerbated by this template which just reminds us of things which are always true and don't need to be posted hundreds of thousands of times across the encyclopedia. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Talk header


 * Keep You can't be serious? Power~enwiki (talk) 23:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep — Unless we have an already working and active alternative. — Paleo  Neonate  – 00:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is an important and widely used template. Besides, all previous discussions resulted in keeping it. See here, here, here, here and here.- electric  Controller  00:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Snow keep this. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: It's a helpful template. — MRD 2014  Talk • Edits • Help! 01:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: full of very useful links for new content editors. --Moxy (talk) 01:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per request --209.249.5.130 (talk) 01:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User fr-11

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:User fr-1. (non-admin closure) Morphdog what did I do now? 02:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC) We have Template:User fr-1. Userfy? XXN, 19:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * User fr-11
 * Speedy Delete — nominated per t3. Userfying wouldn't be a bad idea, considering the template is only used on the user page of Robertgreer. Morphdog what did I do now? 04:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete!--AlfaRocket (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soviet merchant ships during 1979 arab israeli war

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC) This navbox has just three working links out of 4kb of text, and the connection between the articles ("merchant ships which carried military cargoes to Syria and Egypt in October and November 1973") is barely relevant. eh bien mon prince (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Soviet merchant ships during 1979 arab israeli war
 * Delete No navigational benefit. Jellyman (talk) 08:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soviet merchant ships and Operation Anadyr

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC) This massive navbox is used to store article text and has no realistic navigational purposes. eh bien mon prince (talk) 14:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Soviet merchant ships and Operation Anadyr
 * delete, very little useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Davis Cup tie

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  04:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC) unused Frietjes (talk) 14:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Davis Cup tie
 * Delete - per nom.--Wolbo (talk) 14:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Construction and civil engineering companies established in year cat

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. I have deleted this template as the only substantive editor, acknowledging that it is unused and no longer needed. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC) unused Frietjes (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Construction and civil engineering companies established in year cat
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ConsolIndependentCities

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 10:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC) unused, better to navigate by the category (Category:Consolidated city-counties in the United States) Frietjes (talk) 13:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ConsolIndependentCities
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Collapse compact

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 10:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC) unused Frietjes (talk) 13:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Collapse compact
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Centurybox US

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 10:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC) unused, it looks like the century categories are using Template:DecadesAndYears US instead. Frietjes (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Centurybox US
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Batman/adversaries

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  04:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC) Currently has only one transclusion, and the transclusion is in the "User:" namespace. This template is not linked to Template:Batman, and any functionality this subpage had seems to have been hardcoded into its parent page/template. So, delete as unnecessary. Steel1943 (talk) 06:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Batman/adversaries
 * delete, at one point in time, I believe this was transcluded in Template:Batman. that was subsequently expanded, and then the content was moved to Template:Batman characters.  hence, this template is no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * delete :) --AlfaRocket (talk) 20:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1957 RLWC Venues
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 10:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC) templates should be linking for a large number of related articles, not just 2. LibStar (talk) 04:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * 1957 RLWC Venues
 * Delete No navigational benefit. Jellyman (talk) 08:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).