Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 2



Template:Deprecated shortcut

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC) This template has only one transclusion at CHM. However, the template's purpose is redundant to a disambiguation page, and the sole transclusion can be replaced with a disambiguation page tagged with Wikipedia disambiguation. In addition, the example currently used on the page is not an application which this template would be used; informing an editor that a shortcut should not be used, but then only presenting the reader one alternative, is essentially a soft redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:25, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Deprecated shortcut
 * delete, and replace with a disambiguation notice, or something equivalent. Frietjes (talk) 16:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-selfblock

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Creator requested deletion.  Enigma msg  02:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC) Created by a user in what appears to be an attempt to have a template that an admin could place on his account when he requested a self block. I don't think there is really a demand for this: some admins will grant self-block requests, others won't, but it is almost always made clear what the terms are and how to get it undone if that is wanted. Notice doesn't serve much purpose, and I can't think of a reason for keeping it around as a template. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:02, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Uw-selfblock
 * Delete—just another piece of UAD's envelope-pushing (he has a long history of this). By definition a template is never going to be suitable for a self-requested block, since the terms will without exception be specifically discussed between the blocking admin and the subject and tailored to fit the specific situation. &#8209; Iridescent 20:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Okay, but what does the reviewer have to say? In other words, waiting for comment by reviewer.   Ups  and  Downs  (↕) 20:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , are you referring to at AfC? I doubt he would mind deletion if he understood the history here. I only stumbled across it because of 's talk page (where I lurk but rarely comment). Just a brief perusal of your talk page history makes it pretty clear that you are very close to being WP:NOTHERE, and it doesn't take too much thought to put two and two together to realize you likely made this template for yourself a few weeks ago. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I decided to resort to watching new pages to ensure that it is a healthy page. Like Iridescent said, all I have to do is not make any unnecessary edit to be Wikipedia space.  Also regarding WP is not a personal sandbox, the place to test is at test Wikipedia, not here.   Ups  and  Downs  (↕) 20:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete unless somehow there's a serious need, and I accepted it in good faith in all considerations. SwisterTwister   talk  20:47, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Okay, then speedy delete per WP:G7 (I created the draft). I also kept good faith during this discussion.   Ups  and  Downs  (↕) 23:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).