Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 December 11



Template:Daerah di Malaysia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC) Unused. Maybe it might have a use, but as of now it hasn't. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Daerah di Malaysia


 * Delete,already exist as Districts of Malaysia.
 * Delete for Districts of Malaysia would be the better template. District is daerah in English. No need for such redundancy in the native language. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bydgoszcz City Councillors

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC) Navbox that connects articles deleted per Articles for deletion/Members of Bydgoszcz City Council. Renata (talk) 16:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Bydgoszcz City Councillors
 * Delete. Few of Bydgoszcz's city councillors qualify for articles on that basis in and of itself — a couple of them do have stronger notability claims, such as actually serving in the Sejm, but nobody would get an article because city councillor in Bydgoszcz per se. So nearly all of the articles have been deleted, and the few that remain aren't enough to warrant a navbox for them. Bearcat (talk) 00:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Korean awards table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Awards table or, possibly, Template:Awards table2 or Template:Awards table3 or ... Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Propose merging Template:South Korean awards table with Template:Awards table.
 * South Korean awards table
 * Awards table

The former should be merged into the latter. The only difference between these two templates is the order of the parameters ("Category"/"Award" and "Recipient"/"Nominee/work"). The function between the two is exactly the same. ℯ xplicit  07:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Support No need to have country-specific tables for film awards.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Support basically the same template Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Support Agreed with ℯxplicit, though anywhere the template is used should be re-ordered then. M. Billoo 15:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).