Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 25



Template:2008 PIHA Atlantic Division standings

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC) Unused templates. Any pages that once used these templates have been deleted via WP:AFD. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 2008 PIHA Atlantic Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Eastern Conference standings
 * 2008 PIHA Gateway Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Mason Dixon Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Northeast Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Pacific Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Rocky Mountain Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Southeast Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Southwest Division standings
 * 2008 PIHA Western Conference standings
 * 2009 PIHA Eastern Conference standings
 * 2009 PIHA Mason Dixon Division standings
 * 2009 PIHA Northeast Division standings
 * 2009 PIHA Western Conference standings
 * 2009 PIHA Gateway Division standings
 * 2009 PIHA Rocky Mountain Division standings
 * delete, and possibly speed delete per WP:CSD. Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I don't see this as valid template content. This is just bad, unreferenced, article content lurking in the template space. Even if I am mistaken in that belief it is clearly not good template content and nobody needs it for use in their articles hence their lack of use. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: All per nom and rationale above. GauchoDude (talk) 18:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SLBC and Template:SLBD

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 02:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC) The SLBC template is un-used and unlikely to be used in the future. This was only made to cover about 7 pages (like this one) (ever) and the headings on those pages use a different headings now that match other similar (AD) lists, (like this one).tahc chat 21:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * SLBC
 * SLBD

The SLBD template is un-used and unlikely to be used in the future. This was only made for lists that are now merged into other "by century " lists. tahc chat 21:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * delete both, since they are not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Crunchyroll

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Primefac (talk) 13:47, 25 January 2017 (UTC) Not enough links to warrant a navbox Rob Sinden (talk) 09:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Crunchyroll
 * Agreed. It should be deleted. Diogatari (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prototype

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC) There are only two articles in the Prototype series—a navbox is overkill czar  05:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Prototype
 * Delete. Agreed, unnecessary for such a small series. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016-17 Sports event AfDs

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 February 3 Primefac (talk) 00:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 2016-17 Sports event AfDs
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox World Equestrian Games country

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Unused template. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Infobox World Equestrian Games country
 * Comment: I didn't know this even existed.  There are a lot of articles related to the FEI World Equestrian Games], where it potentially could be used (e.g. Show Jumping World Cup.  Are there comparable templates for things like, oh, the World Figure Skating Championships, etc.? I see Infobox Figure Skating Competition, though it doesn't necessarily apply to one set of events.  At WP Equine, we usually use Infobox sport or Infobox recurring event. (The horse racing project has their own separate ones).  So... I guess if we have infoboxen for international competition, then I'd like to keep and use it (Maybe rename for all FEI events, not just the WEG); if not, then I will support consistency with similarly situated events.  Montanabw (talk) 16:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a wrapper for Infobox country at games. Suggest we ask User:Montanabw to notify relevant equestrian projects and see what they say. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC) @User:Montanabw This template is in regards to xxx at the x equestrian competition. Those do not exist and therefore its unnecessary to have this template. Also others have been merged into Infobox country at games. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, unused and not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RSWMX

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC) I've phased this template out of its former use on Mexico radio station templates. Radio Station World was used to build the original templates. However, it has become inaccurate over the years due to AM-FM migration and the assignment of dozens of new noncommercial stations. The lists in the current set of Mexico radio templates are built from the IFT tables. Raymie (t • c) 03:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * RSWMX

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, unused and not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RugbyUnionAt1920SummerOlympics
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 18:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC) Template is unused. Rugby union at the 1920 Summer Olympics uses a standard Infobox template instead. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 07:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * RugbyUnionAt1920SummerOlympics
 * Comment: Slight complication -- it turns out that this is one of a series of related templates. Where there are multiple events such as Template:FencingAt1920SummerOlympics, these function as navboxes. Where there's only one event, however, they're redundant, eg Template:FieldHockeyAt1920SummerOlympics (note "Football"). I've pinged Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Olympics. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: In theory these could/should contain links to separate articles listing squads, qualification etc. in addition to the event links (e.g. Template:Rugby sevens at the 2016 Summer Olympics). However, given that only two teams were involved and that even if there was a qualification system (I doubt it) we wouldn't easily find enough details for a separate article then it can probably all be included in the main article and I don't see a need for the unused template. There may be a few other examples that fall into this category, like the hockey one above, kicking about as well - Ba se me nt 12  (T.C) 16:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, unused, but allow for recreation if more event articles are written. Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).