Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 1



Template:2013–14 UEFA Europa League Group A

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC) unused and duplicates content in 2013–14_UEFA_Europa_League_group_stage. Frietjes (talk) 15:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 2013–14 UEFA Europa League Group A
 * 2013–14 UEFA Europa League Group B
 * 2013–14 UEFA Europa League Group C
 * 2013–14 UEFA Europa League Group D
 * 2013–14 UEFA Europa League Group E
 * 2013–14 UEFA Europa League Group F
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 USA Rugby Men's College 7s National Championship Pool A

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC) merged with 2012 USA Rugby Men's College 7s National Championship. Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 2012 USA Rugby Men's College 7s National Championship Pool A
 * 2012 USA Rugby Men’s College 7s National Championship Pool A
 * 2012 USA Rugby Men’s College 7s National Championship Pool B
 * 2012 USA Rugby Men’s College 7s National Championship Pool C
 * 2012 USA Rugby Men’s College 7s National Championship Pool D
 * 2012 USA Rugby Men’s College 7s National Championship Pool E
 * 2012 USA Rugby Men’s College 7s National Championship Pool F
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2011 Pacific Games men's football tournament – Group A

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC) unused and basically empty. Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 2011 Pacific Games men's football tournament – Group A
 * 2011 Pacific Games men's football tournament – Group B
 * 2011 Pacific Games men's football tournament – Group C
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 4th SS PD

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  11:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 4th SS PD
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 1st SS PD
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 2nd SS PD
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 3rd SS PD
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 5th SS PD
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 8th SS CD
 * Knight's Cross recipients of the 9th SS PD
 * Knight's Cross recipients of JG 1
 * Knight's Cross recipients of SxG 1
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Flag-templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move. to project space Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:33, 13 July 2017 (UTC) Doesn't appear to be used anymore. Not touched since 2009, and flag-article has been deleted. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Flag-templates
 * move Flag-templates to project space. this is effectively a navbox for [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Flag-templates&limit=999&hidelinks=1 about 8 essays]. Frietjes (talk) 20:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:14, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Largest cities of Japan
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. The rationale from the keep !voters sound more solid. Also, a bit quasi-procedural since the time when the sock was blocked, there was no delete vote! (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  11:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC) navigates nothing and redundantized by as list of cities in Japan already exists 68.151.25.115 (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * largest cities of Japan
 * weak keep strong keep, used in two articles and part of a larger series. Frietjes (talk) 19:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * note wp:otherstuffexists. you could treat this as a test case.68.151.25.115 (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * and still "used in two articles", which is why it exists. I have updated my !vote above. Frietjes (talk) 22:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * it is now used in one article because urban area never included the link to list of cities in Japan68.151.25.115 (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have restored the template. Please wait for the discussion to conclude before taking any more actions.  Thank you! Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)  18:50, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Used in two articles. It doesn't make sense to duplicate the content in the two articles in which it is used and, as already pointed out by this is part of a larger series of templates. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * then read Navigation_template. the article at urban area is bloated with pictures and tables where links should suffice.  note also that "city" does not always mean "urban area".  city templates like these dont belong on that page because 'metropolitan area' does not always mean 'city' and does not always mean 'urban area'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.25.115 (talk) 20:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That a template contains images does not make it arbitrarily decorative. The primary purpose of the template is to list the largest cities in a concise, not necessarily to provide navigation per se. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * the template isnt a infobox nor a map or a timeline but a simple truncation of the list. its adds no additional functionality to the articles its on and "templates should not be used to create lists of links to other articles when a category, list page, or "See also" section list can perform the same function" (WP:TG).  the style of the template is like a navbox because it adds no unique information that isnt covered elsewhere.  and it cant be part of a series since theres no universal definition of city.68.151.25.115 (talk) 06:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * As I said, the purpose of the template is to list the cities and to avoid duplicating the same content across multiple articles. That is an entirely appropriate use. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 10:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * the template is inherently flawed and a misnomer. special wards of Tokyo is not a city but an administrative division.  the argument that this fits a series of templates is equally flawed for the same reason.  there isnt a set definition of a city; in this case and in australia's case, different institutions will define a city with different criteria and different definitions.  we have another (notable) article Cities designated by government ordinance of Japan which excludes tokyo from the list.  (here are a few others: Special cities of Japan, Core cities of Japan.)  in List of metropolitan areas in Japan by population, defintions used are authored by the Statistics Bureau of Japan (SBJ) and the Center for Spatial Information Service of the University of Tokyo.  this template is unmaintainable and should be left to appropriate articles/lists.  another issue: is the city largest by population or area?  different government definitions will define cities in different ways.  for these reasons, regardless whether or not the template is used and rendering that argument moot, this template should be removed from both articles.68.151.25.115 (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC) Strong keep - its an objective way to connect important cities of Japan without saying important cities of Japan (which would be rather subjective). In other worlds, it connects cities which you should know if you are interested in Japan, and therefore, it provide navigation between related articles Christian75 (talk) 13:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * only the top 20 cities should be highly known?68.151.25.115 (talk) 06:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is 195(*) countries in the world. That gives you 3900 cities you have to learn about... (*) or more Christian75 (talk) 01:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * and how does that have anything to do with this template? should we list all the towns and cities in japan?  Cities_of_Japan states "The least populous city, Utashinai, Hokkaido, has a population of six thousand, while a town in the same prefecture, Otofuke, Hokkaido, has nearly forty thousand.".  in japans case, a top 20 is subjective not only because of the number but because of administrative and political definitions.68.151.25.115 (talk) 02:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I have already made my point. If the template(s) should contain 15 or 20 or 25 cities - I do not care. It can be discussed afterwards. Christian75 (talk) 12:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * so then is this just a wp:useful argument? we dont make templates for everything per wp:cln.68.151.25.115 (talk) 00:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete covered by Template:Metropolitan cities of Japan. Nav templates should not be based on largest or smallest of something.--Alizaa2 (talk) 14:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pronunciation inline
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  11:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Other templates such as Audio and Pronunciation serve the same function with better implementation. It is also problematic in that the usage cannot be traced back from the audio file's description page on Commons (see for example, a file linked from the template's documentation). This is because since it uses an image instead of a text, it has to link directly to the file URL instead of MediaWiki's standard way. Nardog (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Pronunciation inline

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Russian Gas Centrifuge
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC) All the links except for two are external to Wikipedia, so the template serves no purpose as a navbox. eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Russian Gas Centrifuge

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- ext links in body of the template; not suitable as a navigation template. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Audio-pipe
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  11:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Audio-pipe
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gaurav Narayanan
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Template is now used, and links templates. I see NPASR if there is a new/valid deletion rationale. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Unused and WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Gaurav Narayanan
 * May I know what is the reason behind the article to get delete ? Srivin (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Because it is unused, and it does not contain enough links since the director has only made 3 films. These boxes should have at least 5. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok fine I'll create another only after he does more, but you are right, I created because I felt he deserves. Srivin (talk) 04:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- insufficient navigation and excessive for this type of use. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * keep, connects 4 articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Grammy Award hosts
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:31, 9 July 2017 (UTC) WP:PERFNAV Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Grammy Award hosts
 * Keep I disagree with your rationale here and at the earlier Emmy template nomination (I assume you're also going to nominate the Academy Award and Tony templates?) Being asked to host the ceremony is less like joining the cast of a production than winning an award yourself: It's a recognition of the quality of the host's career so far. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 09:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, my rationale is the same as it was in the prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 13:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and bring back the Emmy one. --charge2charge (talk) 23:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per the reasons also listed at Latin Grammy Award hosts. Erick (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- excessive cross categorisation. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:17 tank brigade (Ukraine)
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete all except Template:Ukrainian armed forces.. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  11:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 17 tank brigade (Ukraine)
 * Plus all templates in:
 * Category:Ukraine military unit templates
 * Category:Ukraine military branch templates
 * Category:Ukraine military type templates
 * Category:Ukrainian military decorations and medals templates

While I can understand why these templates were created, they violate WP:MOSICON (i.e. they are little more than an icon and a link). The "unit" templates are all unused, as I have replaced them with simple wikilinks, but I figured I'd garner consensus for deleting the rest of them before proceeding with the orphaning. Primefac (talk) 01:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete per WP:MOSICON Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * comment, I am really opposing the deletion partially due to the fact that MOSICON policy does allow use of icons and I do not clearly understand your side note "they are little more than an icon and a link". At the same time, I did not see similar icons on Wikipedia and do not really understand the icon's practical use as it does kind of fall under "cool look" criterion. For voting purposes on the subject, I abstained. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 04:15, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all with the exception of Template:Ukrainian armed forces. Similar template exist for and  for example:  & , so this issue should be looked at holistically. But such templates are clearly excessive on a per-unit basis. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I can agree with said exception, given that there are other similar overarching-group templates. Primefac (talk) 17:03, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NPA1
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Unused, no clear use Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * NPA1
 * Keep Wikipedia is not paper. No harm in keeping this. Moscowamerican (talk) 20:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * keep, clearly substituted. Frietjes (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRHP dab cleanup
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to project space. It seems agreed that this template should be deprecated and moved out of template space. Since this template directly relates to a past task of an ongoing WikiProject, the best move destination seems to be a subpage of the WikiProject. I've moved it to WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/NRHP dab cleanup without leaving a redirect. Let me know if you have a different preferred title for this template in either project space or user space. Deryck C. 17:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * NRHP dab cleanup
 * Keep, though it can be marked as "historical" or similar. It's of historical interest, it was used on many of the more than 3,000 NRHP disambiguation pages (most categorized into Category:Disambig-Class National Register of Historic Places articles).  The development and use of the template helped ease controversy about the disambiguation pages which ran for years.  (If this TFD drifts towards "Delete", however, I request that the template be moved to my userspace instead of outright deletion.)  I haven't looked yet, but I believe it was mentioned/linked from a number of disambiguation discussions and probably admin noticeboard discussions.  Deletion undermines understandability of those discussions. -- do  ncr  am  05:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * move to project space and mark as historical. although one could argue that everything related to NRHP is by definition historical :) Frietjes (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ncdr
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ncdr
 * That's usually the case with a template that should be substituted. Multichill (talk) 06:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * keep, clearly substituted. Frietjes (talk) 13:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notability editnotice
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Unused and misspelled warning. We have much nicer templates to say this. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 08:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Notability editnotice
 * What templates do we have that say this, ? The only one I'm aware of that comes close is Editnotice for lists of people, but it serves a very different purpose. – Uanfala 10:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * keep, I see no problem with it as long as it's used as an edit notice, and not put in the prose. Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black Power movement
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Timeline of the Black Power movement and reformat as list/timeline article as suggested Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 23:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC) Enormous template, not helpful in navigation and unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Black Power movement
 * Keep: The template size is largely due to the social movement spanning the time period from 1966 to 1975. A possible solution to the size issue is to create a Timeline of Black Power movement article and remove tangential sections and articles.  The "not helpful in navigation" claim seems strange as the nav template unites articles on Wikipedia centered in this social movement.  That is the point of nav templates.  The claim that it is unused is true, but can be remedied by adding the template to listed articles.  Deleting the template seems to be overkill for a template that only has issues to be addressed. Mitchumch (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, a very good and needed template. It could be condensed a bit (too many sections or subsections, and court cases and possibly other links which had nothing to do with the topic) but this template is far from one which should be deleted. Why wasn't it added to some existing articles (many are tangential, Lyndon Johnson? this wasn't a military campaign) already? That's easily remedied. Overall, a nice template. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * move to a list article, as suggested above. this will also help with the overlap with Template:Black Power sidebar and Template:Campaignbox Black Power movement and Template:African-American Civil Rights Movement. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: To further the idea of removing the overlap, I would propose a merger of the Template:Black Power sidebar into the Template:Black Power movement. The topic of Black Power is a subtopic of the Black Power movement. And I think the nav box can better serve the topic of black power than the sidebar. Mitchumch (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as unused and unwieldy. The suggestion of converting to an article is a good one.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete unless there are reliable sources linking every one of these events, it is simply a hodgepodge linkfarm68.151.25.115 (talk) 01:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a hodgepodge, indeed. For example, the article on the Drug Enforcement Administration does not contain the phrase "Black Power Movement". K.e.coffman (talk) 05:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep very extensive template. Moscowamerican (talk) 22:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete these articles do not a clearly defined relation. What a mess.--Alizaa2 (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1939 shipwrecks
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 12. Primefac (talk) 17:04, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 1939 shipwrecks
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tom Ford
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 23:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC) Unused, would violate WP:NENAN even if used Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Tom Ford

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 21:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * weak keep, I have seen director navboxes with fewer than 5 links. Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- insufficient navigation. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:J. K. Amalou
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * J. K. Amalou
 * Keep -- it's in use now.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 14:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * That still doesn't change that it only links two articles. Per WP:EXISTING and WP:NENAN that's not enough. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- insufficient navigation. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NBA referees
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Fails WP:EXISTING: "Unlinked text should be avoided." The majority of entries is unlinked text. —Bagumba (talk) 23:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * NBA referees

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- excessive listing of nn subjects. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, Category:National Basketball Association referees does a great job of providing navigation between the articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).