Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 11



Template:Sciencecategories

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC) Orphan. This was designed as a duplicate of Portal:Science/Categories for use in articles, but we would never add something like this to an article. DrKay (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sciencecategories
 * delete, we don't need it. Frietjes (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Capital radio schedule

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC) Fails WP:NOTTVGUIDE - Could never be used anywhere and isn't being used anywhere either – Davey 2010 Talk 18:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Capital radio schedule
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, WP is not a schedule guide. Frietjes (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Routemap-Infobox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 20. Primefac (talk) 02:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Routemap-Infobox
 * Infobox UK railway
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:College color boxes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC) The concept of school colors remains the same concept regardless of level. In other words, school colors are school colors regardless of whether it's a K12 School or a University. There is no separate Template like this for K12 school colors, and with good reason: suffices for this purpose. It suffices for college colors as well. The same can be said for Society colors, and fellow Greeks know what I'm talking about for that last example. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 03:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * College color boxes
 * Keep this has the Module:College color incorporated into it so we can keep colors consistent throughout college athletic articles and their conferences. The only reason it was included into the University of Notre Dame is because the university colors are the same as the athletics. Had they been different, the regular color boxes would be there. No valid reason for deletion, nominatior is simply doing this because their edit was reverted for inaccurate colors. Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 04:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * keep, indeed, the entire purpose of this template is to make sure that the colours displayed are the official colours, with sources provided in the module, and not something that one editor didn't think was "blue enough". Frietjes (talk) 12:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This reeks of vindictiveness and bad faith. The reasons for this template have been made quite clear. Smartyllama (talk) 01:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I understand how it could be seen as a duplicate, and I'd say its not wrong to use Template:Color box for colleges, but this serves a purpose and I see no reason to trash it.-- Patrick, o Ѻ ∞ 20:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 03:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Five Families

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC) Delete under WP:CSD, as a substantial duplicate. Same links are included in Organized crime groups in New York City. American Mafia, and at least five other navboxes... -- Rob Sinden (talk) 14:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Five Families

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Delete Template just duplicates others....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redundant: duplicates links now on other navboxes. DrKay (talk) 22:10, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Heads of the Ministries of the Government of India

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 24. Primefac (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Heads of the Ministries of the Government of India
 * Union ministries of India
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Transformation

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 24. Primefac (talk) 00:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Transformation
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rhode Island Rams navbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 24. Primefac (talk) 14:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Rhode Island Rams navbox
 * University of Rhode Island
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).