Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 13



Template:StarsUnfolded

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Unnecessary template based on a non-notable website (Articles for deletion/StarsUnfolded). I don't see any use of this template. GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * StarsUnfolded
 * delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:God of War chronology

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Unused. Navigation dealt with at Template:God of War series Rob Sinden (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * God of War chronology
 * delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anachem Award Recipients

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC) I just wrote an article about a chemist who had received this award, and when I noticed it had its own template, I went ahead and added it in. However, I hadn't heard of the award and decided to look a bit further. The template originally linked its title to the very notable, national-reach American Chemical Society, whose awards are generally very prestigious, but on investigation the award is actually given by a smaller society local to Michigan. (See here and here.) A 2011 CfD deleted a corresponding category and recognized that this is a "borderline non-notable" award, but I think it's not even that. With no disrespect meant to the recipients - most of whom would be easy WP:PROF passes, despite the redlink forest - I don't think this subject needs a navbox. Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Anachem Award Recipients
 * Delete (Good research by nom). More circumstance to consider: there is no article on Anachem Award or its organisation Association of Analytical Chemistry ('Anachem'). So the template is a navbox, while there is no main topic to navigate.
 * The recipients' category was deleted for WP:OCAWARD ('recipients of an award should be grouped in a list rather than a category'; that list being in one of the redlinks I just mentioned, I'd expect). This is even removing the 'borderline' argument from that CfD.
 * Even when there were a blue article link, this award would not merit a navbox for arguments mentioned. -DePiep (talk) 09:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).