Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 7



Template:Contemporary Christian music

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:35, 14 May 2017 (UTC) This nav makes no sense. The list is
 * Contemporary Christian music
 * 1) woefully incomplete
 * 2) would not make sense to be added to the footers of every subject listed (just as it would not make sense to add a footer to ever jazz musician or every Latvian singer or...) and is really attempting to be a category
 * 3) included links to disambiguation pages or no links at all
 * 4) is essentially original research as many of the subjects are primarily involved with contemporary worship music not contemporary Christian music, which is what the template purports to represent and
 * 5) is mislabelled, as it is a list of musicians who perform contemporary Christian music, not links to topic on contemporary Christian music. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, better to use categories. Frietjes (talk) 12:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Find sources

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 May 14. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Find sources
 * Find sources mainspace
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Additional Super Rugby templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:35, 14 May 2017 (UTC) These navboxes are largely duplicating the links already in navbox templates QRU, VRUclubs, and Super Rugby respectively – with additional redlinks in the first two cases to topics not warranting separate pages, or links already covered in other navboxes such as Rugby union in Australia. -- Ham105 (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Queensland Reds
 * Melbourne Rebels
 * Super Rugby champions
 * delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 12:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).