Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 8



Template:User lzh

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn, wrong venue. (non-admin closure) ToThAc (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC) Classical Chinese is a written language. The high form of Sinitic languages. It is based on the long-dead colloquial language of Zhou Dynasty. There is no living native oral speakers of this language. Minimizing Studio (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * User lzh
 * wrong venue, userboxes are discussed at WP:MFD. Frietjes (talk) 16:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IT

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC) redundant to and problematic naming due to confusion with it. Frietjes (talk) 20:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * IT
 * Disagree . IT is not "redundant to ". When you use TSSN, you have to input not only the line name but the colour code, which is not easy to remember or correctly input. Moreover, IT will be widely used (because image icons should be replaced with IT), so this template is needed. On the other hand, I understand there is a problem about the name, so I suggest that IT be moved or renamed instead.--Chiro08 (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please don't use templates like disagree in these discussions. (I'm pretty sure there's a guideline page that says not to do that but I'm feeling a little lazy on the point.) --Izno (talk) 12:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Chiro08, I added automatic colouring for you, so now it really is redundant. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * At a minimum, move and orphan usage. Subsequently, redirect IT to it. No comment on duplicate functionality. --Izno (talk) 12:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete soon, but not immediately . I checked an edit of Template:TSSN by Frietjes, and it is acceptable to replace Template:IT to Template:TSSN. However, this template should not be deleted immediately, because that would confuse some users.--Chiro08 (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * comment, now replaced along with MU, GZ, HY, TO, CY, YR, HZ, NM, FU, AK, SJ, OE, KS, KSN, KHS, and SKL. Frietjes (talk) 19:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much.--Chiro08 (talk) 11:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete immediately. No article links IT, so there is no need to keep IT. (Or should I place the "db-g7" template at the top of IT?)--Chiro08 (talk) 11:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Chiro08, if you add db-g7 at the top of them, they should be deleted very quickly, and the discussion will automatically close. Frietjes (talk) 12:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Done, and this template was deleted. Thank you. --Chiro08 (talk) 13:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vikramarkudu

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 May 16. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Vikramarkudu
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).