Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 28



Template:Chinese history topics

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC) A very odd template, included in other templates with links that navigate to templates. But this means the links to templates appear in articles. They do not look like template links, so any reader unlucky enough to click on them will likely be thoroughly confused. I.e. this breaks two guidelines, on unnecessarily linking across namespaces and on not surprising readers with links to targets they could not have anticipated. If you are viewing the template intentionally then they are linked by their category, Category:China history templates, so it is not needed either to navigate between templates. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 13:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Chinese history topics

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Mnnlaxer &#124; talk  &#124; stalk 04:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YouTube Red

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Does not meet WP:NAVBOX, articles have no direct relation between each other, only that they are part of a subscription service on YouTube. The large amount of red links also shows it is not a defining or notable feature. List of original programs distributed by YouTube Red and Category:YouTube Red original series already exist. So delete. JacktheHarry (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * YouTube Red
 * Keep; more than five non-redirect blue links, and if the shows are notable enough to have articles then the template's not so different to e.g. the Amazon Video navbox. Jc86035 (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep see reasoning by User:Jc86035. Daylen (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep see reasoning by User:Jc86035. Edwardw818 (talk) 08:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it's useful static shakedown ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ  01:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS50

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Deleted by. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Unused, deprecated, impractical. Use Routemap for making unnecessarily wide route diagrams. Jc86035 (talk) 10:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * BS50
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mess1

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Deleted by. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Part of the deprecated series of user warning templates; last used in 2008 and only ever used 23 times between 2006 and then. Delete or redirect to uw-chat1. Jc86035 (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Mess1
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cutpastemove

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Deleted by. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Part of the deprecated series of user warning templates; last used in 2010 and only ever used 19 times between 2006 and then. Delete or redirect to uw-c&pmove. Jc86035 (talk) 09:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Cutpastemove
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Crewe and Chester Line

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Deleted by. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Unused; redundant to the bottom third of North Wales Coast Line RDT. Jc86035 (talk) 09:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Crewe and Chester Line
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS30

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Deleted by. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Unused, deprecated, impractical. Use Routemap for making unnecessarily wide route diagrams. Jc86035 (talk) 09:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * BS30
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:~

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 5. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YC companies

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 5. (non-admin closure) Nihlus  00:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * YC_companies
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).