Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 5



Template:Icelandic political colours

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 15. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Icelandic_political_colours
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mudcrutch

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 14. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Mudcrutch
 * Tom_Petty
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017 Blind T20 World Cup(Semifinals)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f eminist 16:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC) No need for such WP:NAVBOX for this event.  Greenbörg  (talk)  17:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 2017 Blind T20 World Cup(Semifinals)
 * delete, only used in one article. Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, as the template creator I accept the deletion nomination of the template which is used in the only article Suranga Sampath. Extremely apologies for my mistakes. Abishe (talk) 09:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nadiya Hussain

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Now WP:EXISTING and WP:PERFNAV issues dealt with, there is nothing left for the navbox. -- wooden superman  14:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Nadiya Hussain


 * Keep Woodensuperman - please explain logic for deleting content of Nav box then marking this for deletion. Lordb (talk) 10:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * As mentioned above, unlinked entries fail WP:EXISTING, other entries fail WP:PERFNAV. ---- wooden  superman  08:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, WP:FILMNAV, not WP:PERFNAV. -- wooden  superman  11:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --regentspark (comment) 11:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taiwan-note

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC) The template is a large chunk of boilerplate text intended to be inserted into lots of articles, contrary to the first point of WP:TG. Since the text is contentious, it will be subject to frequent changes. It would be better to use text tailored to each context with links to articles with detail. Kanguole 11:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Taiwan-note


 * Neutral/Keep/Redo: This template should serve a disclaimer to Taiwan's political status. Wrestlingring (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * delete. This paragraph of POV text has no place in any article, so definitely does not belong in a template. Even if rewritten to be neutral it serves no point, there is no class of articles that would benefit from such content.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 06:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No need for such a massive block of text to show up all over the place. Relevant information needed in each separate article should be added where it is appropriate, in the text or in a note. But spare us from all of this in every Taiwan-related article. --T*U (talk) 11:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Islam in South Asia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC) In light of the existence of Islam in India, Islam in Pakistan, Islam in Bangladesh, etc. this sidebar is largely redundant. There is also a template named Muslims in South Asia which was originally Islam in South Asia. (Due to aberrations during the move, both templates shared the same talk page. I moved the talk page to Template_talk:Islam_in_South_Asia before becoming aware of the existence of the second template. Please fix as required.)—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 11:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Islam in South Asia
 * Extreme Keep I think Template:Islam in South Asia is very useful. South Asian Muslims are the largest population of Muslims around 600 million people and large part are english speakers so this template has very large potential. If you want to delete one of the template then lets delete this one Template:Muslims in South Asia. Second Template:Islam in South Asia is a completely separate template for separate article from some of the template for South Asian countries. 65.95.136.96 (talk) 11:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I did not know that there was already a template of a similar nature called Muslims in South Asia. That is a better template in my opinion and is quite reflective of the whole of South Asia as opposed to Islam in South Asia which largely focuses on Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. (121.219.22.188 (talk) 11:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC))
 * Delete No sense having several templates that do the same thing.--regentspark (comment) 01:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Full Moon Fever tracks

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Redundant to footer, not really needed. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Full Moon Fever tracks
 * delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).