Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 23



Template:Khowar language

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Khowar_language
 * Khowar_language_sidebar
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of role-playing video games

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * List_of_role-playing_video_games
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Dalai Lama and Template:Infobox religious biography

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure)  J 947(c) (m) 03:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Infobox_Dalai_Lama
 * Infobox_religious_biography
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox LLWSQualifiers-Pre2001

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Unused template Zackmann08  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Infobox LLWSQualifiers-Pre2001
 * Comment: Infobox_LLWSQualifiers should probably have the same keep/delete fate as this template. It's also unused, and both templates are recommended for use at WikiProject Baseball/Little_League_task_force. The task force page has been inactive for a few years, but here's a ping to taskforce member User:JB82. JB82 is still actively editing, and active on this topic. Alsee (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's less arduous than creating a table (and probably less time-consuming, too). --JB82 (talk) 01:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * JB82, the template is unused. I pinged you and posted on the Little League wikiproject to see if there was any likelihood it was going to used in the foreseeable future. However looking more closely at the Little League wikiproject, I suddenly realize that it never actually existed. I couldn't find a single instance of dialog in the last 11 years. Out of the handful of edits there, several were bots or people passing through on maintenance tasks. Alsee (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, then... --JB82 (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as unused. It's also undocumented, and is not an infobox. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, unused, not needed, and not an infobox. Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox carom billiards player

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure)  J 947(c) (m) 03:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Infobox_carom_billiards_player
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ontario crown corporations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC) Existence of this template is redundant since Template:ONGovDept already includes a comprehensive list of provincial Crown agencies and Crown corporations. RA 0808 talkcontribs 16:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ontario crown corporations
 * Delete (creator of template) Daylen (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Meta country at games navboxes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Australia at the Commonwealth Games

These templates (87 in total) are simply wrappers for country at games navbox. The main template updates automatically, meaning each of these templates are just shells. Another reason is to prevent the unnecessary creation of these templates, as demonstrated by the deletion of 20 similar unused templates. As a note, while I am advocating for deletion of these templates, obviously they should be subst'ed/replaced to keep the information itself on the page (which I'm happy to do). Primefac (talk) 16:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Red Star Belgrade squad 1991 European Cup Final

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC) As per WP:FOOTY consensus, we only have historical squad navboxes for international tournaments, not for club competitions. Jellyman (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Red Star Belgrade squad 1991 European Cup Final
 * Delete per consensus on WP:FOOTY. S.A. Julio (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per past consensus. – PeeJay 10:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spain Squad EuroBasket 1959
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC) Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Spain Squad EuroBasket 1959
 * Spain Squad EuroBasket 1975
 * Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spain Squad 2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC) Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Spain Squad 2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup
 * All the squads that competes at this World Cup have their own template. I absolutely disagree with this proposed delation. Puente aereo (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TCREEP. Teams should earn a medal at a minimum.  How many of these bios mention a fourth place finish in their leads?—Bagumba (talk) 09:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spain Squad 1950 FIBA World Championship
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  15:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Spain Squad 1950 FIBA World Championship
 * Spain Squad 1974 FIBA World Championship
 * Spain Squad 1982 FIBA World Championship
 * Spain Squad 1986 FIBA World Championship
 * Spain Squad 1990 FIBA World Championship
 * Spain Squad 1994 FIBA World Championship
 * Spain Squad 1998 FIBA World Championship
 * Spain Squad 2002 FIBA World Championship
 * Russia Squad 2002 FIBA World Championship
 * All the squads that competes at the FIBA World Championship have their own template. I absolutely disagree with this proposed delation. Puente aereo (talk) 13:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * not according to prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TCREEP, as well as prior consensus cited in nom. Teams that do not earn a medal do not need the Wikipedia equivalent of a participation award.—Bagumba (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC) Duplicates the function of Template:Million-plus agglomerations in India. DrKay (talk) 07:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Most populous cities in the Republic of India
 * The template Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India showcases only the top 20 populated cities of India. Rishabsingh.nitt (talk) 07:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Like Template:Largest cities of India? DrKay (talk) 08:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Please delete the template Template:Largest cities of India as it is outdated. The template Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India has the updated census details.please check this article List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India. Rishabsingh.nitt (talk) 18:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That's not how we do things here. We edit the old template not create a new one. You're essentially suggesting a cut-and-paste move alongside deletion of the attribution history, which is in violation of the licensing terms: Copying within Wikipedia. DrKay (talk) 06:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay. Go ahead. Delete the template Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India. Rishabsingh.nitt (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete duplicate of Template:Largest cities of India, and as explained above, WP:CWW. --Muhandes (talk) 22:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hull & Barnsley Railway (inline)
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  15:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Unused. Use Hull & Barnsley Railway instead. Jc86035 (talk) 04:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hull & Barnsley Railway (inline)
 * delete, was probably a useful fork at one point in time, but it's not needed now. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).