Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 3



Template:Boldmono

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 14. Primefac (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Boldmono
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Youtuber

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC) vanity page in template space. noq (talk) 11:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Youtuber


 * Delete - Not a template - Just an editor mistaking the templatespace for articlespace, Doesn't link anywhere, Obvious delete. – Davey 2010 Talk 12:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under WP:G11. —  Newslinger  talk   13:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Deleted per G11 as a misplaced promo page by a new user, just as I saw the MFD template.- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Strong support

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I hesitate to do a G4 deletion when the previous discussions were so long ago, but the present discussion is clearly heading towards delete, suggesting a WP:SNOW deletion, and the fact that several past discussions all led to a consensus to delete reinforces that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC) See: Templates_for_discussion/Log/Deleted/June_2005, Templates_for_discussion/Log/Deleted/November_2005, Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_3, Deletion_review/Log/2007_May_4, Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_June_5, Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_October_30, Deletion_review/Log/2008_July_17, Deletion_review/Log/2012_April_6. Consensus has been repeatedly against these templates staying on WP. —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 02:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong support

*Keep - Consensus changes and FWIW the project was hell of a lot different in 2007/2008 and even 2012, The template has its uses so no harm keeping. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I didn't take into account the XFD process, I thought more along the lines of RFA, It's useful but not for XFD so delete. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 * delete per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Additionally, !votes should be evaluated on the strength of the argument, not the adjective used to describe it. See WP:ADJ. —  Newslinger  talk   11:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:G4. Tagged. —  Newslinger  talk   13:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G4. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).