Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 4



Template:T-Squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 05:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC) This unused band's navigational template consists of seven links: One valid member article known more for acting, two non-notable cover versions of songs and four redlinks of articles that were deleted (the band itself, one of the members, the only album and their discography.) Aspects (talk) 18:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * T-Squad
 * delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, clear-cut G8 ("pages dependent on a nonexistant or deleted page"). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Move review

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Move review talk. Primefac (talk) 05:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC) This template is no longer to be used at the top of articles undergoing a move review. We therefore no longer need this template. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move review
 * Delete Unnecessary, deprecated template. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirecting to Template:Move review talk seems the most sensible option as the title is a viable shortcut for that template. I wouldn't want to have its history deleted because – in the absence of any further considerations – it's preferable to ratain it for historical record (which I think would chime in with the opinions expressed in the discussion that led to the template's deprecation. – Uanfala (talk) 11:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 02:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: Is blanking and marking as deprecated an option for templates? --Paul_012 (talk) 07:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It's an option that's not uncommonly practiced, see Category:Deprecated templates. – Uanfala (talk) 10:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Template:Move review talk seems reasonable. wbm1058 (talk) 04:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Template:Move review talk. No such user (talk) 10:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect. (to Move review talk) I see no problem with the Mrt template appearing where this template once appeared. Both templates are transcluded and not substituted, so appearance of this template on a few talk-page-archive pages would not be too adversely affected by redirection. Don't want to lose its page history, either. This would make a good shortcut for the Mrt template, as well.  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  00:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).