Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 11



Template:ALeagueMatchSummaryLine

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Only used at one article and the content is fairly generic despite the template name (home/away team, score etc.). In any case the article is only referenced from the league’s page and may not be notable. Eldumpo (talk) 00:03, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ALeagueMatchSummaryLine
 * delete after replacing with football box, which is the standard. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * delete then replaced with football box per above Hhkohh (talk) 06:56, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:34, 13 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as above. GiantSnowman 09:34, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Poland in Junior Eurovision

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC) appears to be a fork of Template:Poland in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest Frietjes (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Poland in Junior Eurovision
 * Delete as Creator: I made the template due to a mistake where the actual Template:Poland in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest was not showing up, which made me believe there was no template. It should be deleted. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 23:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under G7 and T3. -- wooden  superman  13:51, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Steven (Editor) (talk) 15:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be created in mistake by the creator who admits so. Sdmarathe (talk) 15:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hypothetical Vomit

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC) Completely redundant. The band itself is up for AfD as a non-notable group, but as none of their records are notable and there isn't a single link contained in this navbox, it's literally useless. Richard3120 (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hypothetical Vomit


 * Delete as pointless. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nav box that navigates literally nothing. -- Whpq (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was planning on nominating this for deletion if the article were deleted, but it's true that this navbox doesn't aid navigation. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – fails to aid in navigation. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 20:03, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Greek letter templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 23. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Gamma
 * Lambda
 * Mu
 * Theta
 * Tau
 * TAU
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of fashion

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Propose merging Template:History of fashion with Template:Fashion.
 * History of fashion
 * Fashion

For plain convenience, "fashion" being on ongoing historical theme anyway. Chicbyaccident (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * support no reason for 2 templates. -- Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:05, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * do not merge, seems fine having two templates, with one focusing on the time line. the bigger problem is the duplication of template:history of fashion with Template:historical clothing. Frietjes (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:56, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Frietjes - no problem to have two templates with different subject matter, and the historical template does do a good job of linking relevant articles. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:London Lightning

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Now tangential, duplicate, and non-existing articles have been removed there is hardly anything worth navigating. -- wooden superman  11:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * London Lightning


 * Delete - not useful as a navigation template. --Gonnym (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Wikilinks suffice. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough useful content. Sdmarathe (talk) 14:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Halifax Hurricanes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Now tangential, duplicate, and non-existing articles have been removed there is hardly anything worth navigating. -- wooden superman  11:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Halifax Hurricanes


 * Delete - not useful as a navigation template. --Gonnym (talk) 11:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Wikilinks suffice. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Island Storm

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Now duplicate and tangential links have been removed, there is nothing to navigate. -- wooden superman  11:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Island Storm


 * Delete - not useful as a navigation template. --Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Wikilinks suffice. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of useful content. Sdmarathe (talk) 08:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Infobox settlement wrappers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 19. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Infobox_Canton
 * Infobox_Latvian_district
 * Infobox_Maldives_atoll
 * Infobox_Province_of_China_(PRC)
 * Infobox_region_of_Italy
 * Infobox_Ukrainian_oblast
 * Infobox_Venezuelan_state
 * Infobox_Vienna_District
 * Infobox_Partido_Argentina
 * Infobox_Peru_region
 * Infobox_German_state
 * Infobox_Bulgarian_province
 * Infobox_Scotland_county
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cool Air

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC) Speedy delete under WP:CSD as this navbox duplicates links all present in Media based on H. P. Lovecraft works. -- wooden superman  10:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Cool Air
 * Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep This discussion makes no sense because the template that you are saying this duplicates is still under discussion at Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_30. That template may be merged away in that discussion. This should be discussed jointly with that consideration. Furthermore, as a template based on a work, it is a more meaningful contribution to the pages it is related to. Its contents are cluttered with unrelated derivatives of other works in the broader works templates. Those broader templates cause derivatives of one work to appear on the pages of derivatives of other unrelated works simply based on the fact that the author of the original is the same.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Tony, Media based on H. P. Lovecraft works is not currently under discussion. You seem to have confused it with another template, maybe Works of H. P. Lovecraft.  I have already pointed this out to you.  -- wooden  superman  09:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I see the talk page post now. There you say "the whole system of navboxes for Lovecraft is a complete mess". This is the wrong solution. Media based on H. P. Lovecraft works should be deleted or used only on derivatives of works that have at most a two or three derivatives (thus not having their own template). Most authors have a biographical template that encompasses their own work and templates for their individual works that have spawned lots of derivatives. Lovecraft has several templates, such as this, for works that have spawned derivatives. They should not be mashed together in a single template that is confusing to the reader and causes derivatives of one work to be on the page of derivatives of another work as well as causes variously-named derivatives to be points of confusion more than anything else.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The single navbox for all adaptations/media is absolutely the correct approach here, rather than individual templates, especially as some of this media is derived from multiple works, including two in this navbox: Necronomicon (film), which is based on three separate stories; and Call Girl of Cthulhu, which doesn't even seem to be based on "Cool Air", instead being "very loosely based on the writings of H. P. Lovecraft". No matter what happens with any of the other navboxes, this one is redundant.   -- wooden  superman  14:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is redundant to the parent template.  A parent template like Media based on Stephen King works might be easier to navigate and assuage some concerns above, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * delete, redundant. Frietjes (talk) 11:51, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).