Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 2



Template:Atletico Roma F.C. squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC) The football club was folded in 2011. the navigation template had no use Matthew hk (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Atletico Roma F.C. squad
 * Delete - no need for a squad template for a team that does not exist. 21.colinthompson (talk) 17:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:10, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * delete no need for folked teams Hhkohh (talk) 16:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * delete per the nomination. -- Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of fashion

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 11. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:56, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * History_of_fashion
 * Fashion
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox baseball biography

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. WP:TFD is for discussing deletions and mergers, not for discussing style changes. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:28, 9 December 2018 (UTC) While this template does ensure that all relevant information for baseball players is displayed, in my view, it falls short in terms of consistency with other infoboxes and to me, it looks more like a wikitable than an infobox. I just would like to suggest that maybe it is modified so that its design is more in line with other templates of its kind? &#32; Eolais | Talk | Contribs  14:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Infobox baseball biography
 * keep, changes to appearance can be discussed on the talk page for the infobox. Frietjes (talk) 20:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite reorganization plan

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC) Only five uses in articles. Cite web would easily suffice. Jc86035 (talk) 09:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Cite reorganization plan


 * Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:10, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox water ride

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 13. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:25, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Infobox_water_ride
 * Infobox_roller_coaster
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-editfilter4im

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. WP:NPASR Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC) Despite the current template name, this would be the "4im" template in the "uw-attempt" series (see Template messages/User talk namespace). It is not currently documented beyond the template page itself. As I see it, there are two uses for this series. The first is to warn a user who attempts to disruptively edit but whose edit is disallowed by the edit filter. I would question the use of any user warning in this situation because the user is already receiving a warning from the edit filter. The second is to warn a user who is disruptively testing the edit filter. In this situation, I don't think it would be appropriate to use a "4im" warning. Thoughts? Bsherr (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Uw-editfilter4im
 * As the creator of said template, might it be better to move it to uw-attempt4im or move the {{ uw-attempt series to {{ uw-editfilter}} instead? Just a thought. ToThAc (talk) 14:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree, if the template should be kept. But should it be kept? --Bsherr (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

 {{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC)  {{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:58, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User MU

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep and move to WP:MFD Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Blank template. Apparently, created on August 6, 2018 and not worked on since. It is unlikely to improve. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * User MU
 * ,thanks for tagging

this is my alternate account of Awangba. I want to put ("This user is/was a student at the Manipur University.") in this template MU,but I still confused how to add in this template. Afingba Mangang (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Duplicate to Commons

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:58, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Intended for a situation where a "good " image should be duplciated to commons despite being tagged as Keep local. Deletion proposed because some uploaders have reasons for not uploading to Commons directly. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Duplicate to Commons
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).