Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 22



Template:StarStruck

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Unused  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 22:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * StarStruck
 * I can see that this has been depopulated. Can I know why? – H T  D  02:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * As was explained in this edit summary a lot of the entries were removed per WP:PERFNAV. Others were removed because there should only be one link to each article and one was text with no link, which serves no purpose in a box meant to enable navigation between related articles. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 03:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:PERFNAV doesn't mean much to me as that page is rather long. This navbox previously had plenty of links, and just like the pages were it is linked today, is now practically decimated. The season articles don't even use this navbox. What gives? Can't the season articles use this navbox any more? How about previous finalists' articles? What makes this different, than say, American Idol? – H  T  D  12:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:PERFNAV, which is only 68 words long, essentially says not to include the names of actors/actresses, comedians, television/radio presenters, writers, composers, etc in navboxes. What makes this template different to the American Idol navbox is that this template complies with WP:PERFNAV, while American Idol does not. It needs to be pruned. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Airline codes page/top

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. after merging with the main list as suggested Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC) No reason for this text to be stored in a template instead of directly in List of airline codes, where the other articles can transclude it with. The Airline codes page/bottom template has no direct #section-h match, but still there no reason is should be stored in a template rather than transcluded using WP:LST from the main article. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 22:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Airline codes page/top
 * Airline codes page/bottom
 * In other words, this is exactly the same situation as Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 29 and Templates for discussion/Log/2016 October 30 &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

NFL All-Pro Team navboxes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:26, 2 March 2018 (UTC) These annual navboxes for All-Pro picks cause clutter and are WP:TCREEP. See examples like Ray Lewis or Peyton Manning. It becomes unwieldy when accomplished players start accumulating them each year. We already have enough navboxes from annual Super Bowl champs (Category:Super Bowl navigational boxes) and annual league award winners (Category:National Football League award navigational boxes). While it's notable how many times a player has been named All-Pro in their career, it's not notable enough for a navbox to call out the other honorees that year. Also, we don't currently limit All-Pro's listed in infoboxes to the Associated Press (AP) selector, but these navboxes only list the AP selections. Let's not invite navboxes for other All-Pro selectors or the annual Pro Bowl too.—Bagumba (talk) 10:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * 1970 All-Pro Team
 * 1971 All-Pro Team
 * 1972 All-Pro Team
 * 1973 All-Pro Team
 * 1974 All-Pro Team
 * 1975 All-Pro Team
 * 1976 All-Pro Team
 * 1977 All-Pro Team
 * 1978 All-Pro Team
 * 1979 All-Pro Team
 * 1980 All-Pro Team
 * 1981 All-Pro Team
 * 1982 All-Pro Team
 * 1983 All-Pro Team
 * 1984 All-Pro Team
 * 1985 All-Pro Team
 * 1986 All-Pro Team
 * 1987 All-Pro Team
 * 1988 All-Pro Team
 * 1989 All-Pro Team
 * 1990 All-Pro Team
 * 1991 All-Pro Team
 * 1996 All-Pro Team
 * 2000 All-Pro Team
 * 2001 All-Pro Team
 * 2002 All-Pro Team
 * 2003 All-Pro Team
 * 2004 All-Pro Team
 * 2005 All-Pro Team
 * 2006 All-Pro Team
 * 2007 All-Pro Team
 * 2008 All-Pro Team
 * 2009 All-Pro Team
 * 2010 All-Pro Team
 * 2011 All-Pro Team
 * 2012 All-Pro Team
 * 2013 All-Pro Team
 * 2014 All-Pro Team
 * 2015 All-Pro Team
 * 2016 All-Pro Team
 * 2017 All-Pro Team
 * Delete per nom. Jerry Rice would have 10 of these navboxes. Ten. Lizard  (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. There are already multiple navboxes on most players' pages and we certainly do not need more of them due to WP:TCREEP. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - yearly award navboxes for professionals are overkill as there is no limit to how many times a person can win an award. Rikster2 (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody else.--Yankees10 17:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Even though I put all the time and effort into half of them, I understand how they aren’t really needed and cause clutter to players like Peyton Manning. They need to go RoyalsLife 04:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This information is already in the All-Pro Team articles. As mentioned, putting it at the bottom of every participants article is not ideal. Mamyles (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox lunar eclipse

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 3. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 19:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Infobox_lunar_eclipse
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018 UPSL Southeast standings

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. The main article was undeleted mid-discussion, so it is hard to tell if there is consensus for merging the templates with the main article. Please feel free to renominate if you would still like to see it deleted, or have the standings merged with the main article. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Article was deleted per Articles for deletion/2018 UPSL season. So no need. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * 2018 UPSL Midwest – West standings
 * 2018 UPSL Southeast standings
 * 2018 UPSL Colorado – Pro Premier standings
 * 2018 UPSL Colorado – Championship standings
 * 2018 UPSL Midwest – North standings
 * 2018 UPSL Midwest – East standings
 * 2018 UPSL Midwest – Central standings
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Please note - the page has been undeleted, and thus we've effectively restarted the discussion. I have also merged all of the discussions together because the original listings had literally the same votes in the same order by the same people.
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 13:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment That article is currently undergoing a deletion review. This template should not be deleted until the DRV is complete. Smartyllama (talk) 17:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per outcome of the deletion review. Jay eyem (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * merge with the article, and delete, single use template. Frietjes (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep or subst then delete  It is a useful table now. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It should be like Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 15. So I think it should keep. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep or subst then delete It adds value and tracing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.172.134.228 (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)  — 205.172.134.228 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep useful statistical table for notable league SportingFlyer  talk  21:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Use Jamaican English

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was do not merge. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Use Jamaican English with Template:Use British English.
 * Use Jamaican English
 * Use British English

Jamaican English is a continuum between Jamaican Standard English (which uses British spelling and grammar, but different pronunciation) and Jamaican Patois (which is rarely written and not appropriate for a work intended to be understandable by most English readers). Articles related to Jamaica should use Jamaican Standard English/British English spelling. Since they are the same thing (as far as spelling), and this template is about which type of spelling should be used, the Use Jamaican English template should be merged into the Use British English template. Kaldari (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - while Jamaican English spellings and grammar may be identical to UK, there remains an issue of vocabulary and wording choices (see potential examples in Jamaican English). If the overall vocabulary differences are trivial, merging the template would seem warranted. Otherwise, it may indicate that certain UK wording choices are not necessarily appropriate. Dl2000 (talk) 04:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose per DL2k - Although Jamaican is similar to English in terms of spelling etc it's still a different language and so IMHO it deserves its own entity. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:35, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep We have an article specifically for Jamaican English, which suggests that it is distinct enough for a separate info template. Mamyles (talk) 18:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Timeline of Microsoft Office
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 3. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 23:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Timeline_of_Microsoft_Office_for_Windows
 * Timeline_of_Microsoft_Office_for_Mac
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mexican brands
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Does not pass WP:LISTN, vague scope is rife for promotional misuse. 1292simon (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Mexican brands
 * It's not a list. --Michig (talk) 07:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * delete, better to navigate with Category:Mexican brands and List of Mexican brands, to avoid excessive cross-linking of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NSWMPs
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 23:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC) unused; most likely replaced by other succession templates Frietjes (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * NSWMPs
 * Delete Confirmed that this is unused. Mamyles (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wenshan Line (Taipei Metro) RDT
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 23:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC) unused; probably because it duplicates the map in Template:Wenhu Line (Taipei Metro) RDT Frietjes (talk) 00:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Wenshan Line (Taipei Metro) RDT
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This template is a duplicate of a better-looking template, as mentioned by nom. Mamyles (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).