Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 16



Module:Ordinal

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 25. Primefac (talk) 00:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Ordinal
 * OrdinalSuffix
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Oldafd

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Nobody commented in this discussion. Seems this module was previously under development and testing but the creator is inactive now. If the creator or other editors want to develop this module in the future, feel free to request any admin to restore it. Note that if this module is recreated in the future, WP:CSD is not applied. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 13:54, 24 July 2018 (UTC) This seems to be a textbook example of all 3 of my main module deletion criteria. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 15:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * oldafd
 * 1) It is unused except in the creator's userspace
 * 2) It does nothing that needs to be in lua, nor would even need to use parser functions in wikitext
 * 3) Old AfD, the template that this is presumably trying to implement, is a wrapper around old AfD multi, which is already luafied using Module:old AfD multi.
 * Remember to delete the Module:Oldafd/testcases when this module is deleted. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 16:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gravity tracks

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 02:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) not needed, only one link Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Gravity tracks
 * Where We Are tracks
 * Delete per nom and redundant navigation to Westlife singles. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 17:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Top Ten Indonesian Badminton Players - Mixed doubles

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Top Ten Indonesian Badminton Players. Soft redirect. No objections, reasonable nomination; choosing redirect as it's a valid possible search term and no page has both templates. Primefac (talk) 00:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Repeating the Template:Top Ten Indonesian Badminton Players. Its should not to be divided in to five events, since the Template:Top Ten Indonesian Badminton Players already mentioned about that. Stvbastian (talk) 00:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Top Ten Indonesian Badminton Players - Mixed doubles
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).