Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 22



Module:Infobox diplomatic dispute

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC) The template that this was presumably intended to be used on, Template:Infobox diplomatic dispute, was deleted. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Infobox diplomatic dispute
 * Delete - Forgot to delete the module, my apologies. As the creator of the module, I would be ok with this being deleted. Thanks for the nom. Best, Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 11:45, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Infobox college coach/convert

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Input deprecated format is no longer used anywhere, therefore useless &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 20:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Infobox college coach/convert
 * Delete - per nom. Dreamy Jazz talk &#124; contribs 12:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Camarines Sur labelled map

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Unused, and useless now that File:Map of Cam. sur per Districts.png has been deleted. Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Camarines Sur labelled map
 * Delete - per nom. Dreamy Jazz talk &#124; contribs 12:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Happy! ratings

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC) excessive per prior discussion Frietjes (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Happy! ratings
 * Fresh Off The Boat ratings
 * Wrecked ratings
 * The Haves and the Have Nots ratings
 * The Detour ratings
 * Superstore ratings
 * Supergirl ratings
 * Shadowhunters ratings
 * Scream Queens ratings
 * Queen of the South ratings
 * Queen Sugar ratings
 * Quantico ratings
 * Preacher ratings
 * Person of Interest ratings
 * OK K.O.! Let's Be Heroes ratings
 * New Girl ratings
 * Legion ratings
 * Into the Badlands ratings
 * Insecure ratings
 * House Of Lies ratings
 * Haven ratings
 * Greenleaf ratings
 * Elementary ratings
 * Blindspot ratings
 * Ballers ratings
 * 12 Monkeys ratings


 * Delete all Per previous discussions, all unnecessary, they provide no further enyclopedic value. --  Alex TW 12:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, looking at the creator's contributions, they are just creating these templates in the template-space and not even adding them to articles, meaning that they are only spamming the creation of these templates. --  Alex TW 12:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete all But please don't forget : { {Scandal ratings}} or { {The Walking Dead ratings}} oh ! and { {Game of Thrones ratings}}, enjoy ! ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs)
 * Do you admit to deliberately spamming the template namespace? --  Alex TW 15:31, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you admit Mr.AlexTheWhovian to simply favoring the shows that interest you ? To say with your pretty words that this "has no interest" but in this case, delete ALL the templates because really, really IT BOTHERS ME ! Oh my God ! I am committing a crime ! Every time I make a template I bring sources (so this one do not come from nowhere like magic !) Then the ratings have a meaning, may not be for you, but guess what, YOU ARE NOT THE CENTER OF THE WORLD! In spite of all your competences and your contributions on Wikipedia, stop believing that the pages belong to you and that everything must be created according to your good will. Because why Games of Thrones would have the right to his template ? And not the others? Do you want to know why I did not publish them on the pages and leave them? Because I knew that a guy like you who has nothing else to do with his days would take them off as soon as he sees them. Honestly what you do is so stupid, that I do not even understand why I write to you, because in the end my dear Alex you have what you wish because WITH YOUR "HUGE" success on wikipedia you delete everything that you do not like. So good luck, but know one thing, your behavior makes me laugh a lot.


 * With all my respect DownFame.
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs)
 * As can be seen, the creating editor has no intent to discuss this civilly, and they admit to creating them simply to spam. (Do you want to know why I did not publish them on the pages and leave them?), which is very clearly WP:NOTHERE. --  Alex TW 01:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)


 * As can be seen, the creating editor has no intent to discuss and take into consideration what I said : all my templates I created are provided with sources. So are not useless, and very interesting to know where are the show in the world of series, I encourage you to delete The Walking Dead template for example ... We'll see if all the fans will be happy with your action ! So if you just want to post them on the pages no problem, I do it. But stop saying that this "SPAM" ! It's not something that appears on your screen suddenly, it proves that you are looking for information and that you are intersted by that, right ? Then instead of wanting to delete and find that pointless, contributed to that and make it useful ! Because sometimes before you want to delete everything for no reason you have to know how to look behind your shoulder to see if it interferes with people and not just ourselves. I've talked about myself to people who love series a lot and they will often see Wikipedia audiences to see if it's worth watching this or that series. So will you continue to say that they are "spam", or develop why you do not like it (ratings templates) ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 12:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia audiences don't know of the template namespace. You created them, you had no intention to implement them. Hence, spam.--  Alex TW 12:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As I said above I had intention to implement them (so that it does not remain "spam"...) but the question is, will you let me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 12:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not whether I'll "let you", it's more of a question on you knowing that the consensus here is to delete them, and yet you're creating more. Are you deliberately being disruptive now? You can be reported and blocked for that. And why aren't you signing your posts properly, and copying unsigned tags from your previous posts? --  Alex TW 08:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * "The consensus here is to delete them" let me laugh ! Why not have integrated the series The 100, iZombie (and I repeat myself again), The Walking Dead and Fear The Walking Dead, Games of Thrones and more ! Who all have ratings !!! And I'm not "disruptive" I defend my idea and the principle that the ratings are very useful on Wikipedia and have their places, so go (and I repeat myself again!) remove ratings Games Of Thrones have seen the number of people who will be satisfied..."You can be reported and blocked for that." is it a threat? Honestly if you are happy do it, but without problem I would be for the integration of templates with their sources on Wikipedia. And why I aren't signing MY posts properly, and copying unsigned tags from my previous posts, it's because I do not have all the experience you have my dear Alex (only for ratings)... — Preceding unsigned comment added by DownFame (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 12:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you see a single keep vote? No? All delete votes? Clearly you didn't see my nomination for the main template to be deleted either. You're being disruptive by creating more while they're being nominated for deletion. I've already told you how to sign your posts. As you can see: deliberately disruptive. Keep trying to be clever. --  Alex TW 10:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Who is the disrupter? The one that removes the graphics on the pages that I just integrated as he wanted so well, while he complains that it's "spam" if it is not integrated, or the one who tries to go from the Wikipedia front, to fill the pages intelligently with sources? I think my dear Alex that the one who is disruptive is not me (despite my ignorance for the signature, excuse me ...) but the one that prevents to make sure to develop Wikipedia and which remains in a Wikipedia of the 2000s without ever thinking about the future -- DownFame 14:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Now you're copying my signature because you're a tiny bit grumpy at me. Aww. I see you don't want to discuss at all. As can be seen, absolutely nobody agrees with you or your view. Cheerio, kiddo. --  Alex TW 15:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per prior discussion. [[User:TomasTomasTomas|''' TOMAS TO MAS TOMAS ]] 🆃🅰🅻🅺 01:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom and precedent. -- wooden  superman  14:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually, technically we could speedy delete these under WP:CSD per comment by author above. -- wooden  superman  14:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tfd2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 1. Primefac (talk) 02:49, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Tfd2
 * Catfd
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Netflix original films

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If similar instances of this template are recreated in the future, G4 would most certainly apply. Primefac (talk) 00:12, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Per a previous discussion, this has been recreated under a slightly different name.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Netflix original films
 * Delete I can already picture the mess this is gonna end up looking like as this will just expand infinitely. ElizaOscar (talk) 14:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * delete per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 16:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Best as a category. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – Works better as a category. —Joeyconnick (talk) 21:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Already a category. Foia req (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * There is a category, but its a combination of all the films, upcomming and so on... Christian75 (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * so, split the category into subcategories? Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - its a good way to navigate between Netflix films which a category can not do. The category is a big mess of films from all years and includes upcomming films. But if the category-system works better we should split the category in yeats if this template is deleted. (nobody is using the category (https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Category:Netflix_original_films) but Wikipedians use a lot of energy to categorise things) Christian75 (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * what makes you think people are using the template for navigation? seems like people are [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Category:Netflix_original_films|Template:Netflix_original_films|List_of_original_films_distributed_by_Netflix using the list article], which definitely better than a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 13:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Can't get an accurate estimate from that, because it depends on people navigating to the template page, may have to ask a wikipedia admin about page referrals from pages that aren't directly link to the list page. Also, MGM for example has distributed over 2,000 films. Foia req (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per previous and above. Dreamy Jazz talk &#124; contribs 12:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - No idea why this was recreated so quickly. Same rationale as per previous discussion. JustaFilmFan (talk) 23:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under WP:CSD. -- wooden  superman  14:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. See also Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 26.  -- wooden  superman  14:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - The list is better. Landingdude13 (talk) 07:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. See also Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 27.  -- wooden  superman  09:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coroner of Kings County, New York

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC) Has only one blue link and the only page it is used at is Coroner of New York City which already has a complete list within the article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Coroner of Kings County, New York
 * Delete - per the reasoning of the nominator. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Dreamy Jazz talk &#124; contribs 12:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).