Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 30



Template:Falcons Pro Football Hall of Famers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC) This template is irrelevant and only causes clutter (especially for guys like Eric Dickerson and Deion Sanders. There is no related article and it's really small. RoyalsLife 18:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Falcons Pro Football Hall of Famers
 * Delete per WP:TCREEP. Inductees already have non-team specific HOF navboxes. Team-specific ones add to the clutter, moreso in the common case where they played for multiple teams.—Bagumba (talk) 10:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The award doesn't have an article and isn't defining....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:TNT

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 8. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * TNT
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Graph:Map

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC) Only used on one user talk page; not genericizable, interactiveness seems to be broken
 * Graph:Map


 * agree, this template should probably be replaced with the likes of --Yurik (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Graph:TemporalMap

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC) Unused, seems too specific for any use I can think of, interactive functionality appears to be broken &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Graph:TemporalMap
 * agree, same as previous, should be replaced (redirect?) to . --Yurik (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Now United

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC) Transcluded in one article and could be in one other, and each already links to and from one another. Doesn't further aid navigation. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 00:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Now United
 * Delete. Useless.  Most of the links shouldn't even be in there.  -- wooden  superman  11:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 18:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 14:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019 in Asian football (AFC)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:41, 8 April 2018 (UTC) WP:TOOSOON, almost red links Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 22:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 2019 in Asian football (AFC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment : Pages for major events such as 2019 AFC Asian Cup and 2019 AFC Champions League have been already created, including some leagues, such as 2018–19 UAE Pro-League and more 2018–19 leagues pages will be created soon as well. Does this make it WP:TOOSOON then? Coderzombie (talk) 08:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * But only 5 7 non-red links, so it is better to create in late April or early May. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 08:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, domestic league and cap part only has 2 non-red links. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 13:09, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - TOOSOON, and currently doesn't serve as useful navigation tool. GiantSnowman 09:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 14:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * keep per who says better to create in late April or early May which is in a couple weeks.  pointless to delete now, just to recreate it in two weeks.  if you don't like all the redlinks, then comment them out until the articles are written. Frietjes (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I mean non-redlinks will increase at that time. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arin Paul
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC) I deleted the main article at AfD, now there's just one blue link on this template, nothing else to link to, so I'm bringing it here. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Arin Paul
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).