Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 6



Living presidents & living vice-presidents of the United States

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Living presidents and vice presidents of the United States. Templates can be substituted and then deleted. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Update: after discussions at User talk:MSGJ and Talk:Living presidents of the United States I am adding a few comments to my close. It has been pointed out that while the Template:Living presidents of the United States and Template:Living vice presidents of the United States only had a single use, their subtemplates were used multiple times. So notwithstanding the validity of the "single use" argument as a deletion rationale, it would not apply to these subtemplates. Any future templates created to help with these tables will not qualify under G4 if they are called more than once. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

(combining as it seems the discussion should be conducted together YBG (talk) 00:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC))

Template:Living vice presidents of the United States

 * Living vice presidents of the United States

Single-use template--just integrate into the article. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:37, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.— Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 00:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:Living presidents of the United States
Single-use template--just integrate into the article. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Living presidents of the United States


 * Delete per nom.— Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 00:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Discussion & !votes for living POTUS and living VEEP

 * keep. (1) The tables are quite complex and single-use templates are an effective way to keep complex formatting from cluttering up article space. (2) Each template depends on subtemplates used dozens or even hundreds of times. Integrating into the article would require eliminating the sub-templates and so a huge amount of repetition. (Full disclosure: I am the author of these templates) YBG (talk) 00:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have advertised this discussion on the talk page of the article that uses the templates. I also repaired the broken format in the two templates by adding a line break after the TfD template so the software will recognize the table-begin syntax. Also, I combined these two items into a single discussion so that they could be discussed together, and re-targeted the TfD discussion to point to the combined discussion.  In combining the two discussions, I tried to do the absolute minimum of editing to what you had entered here. I have, however, added comments in the wikitext suggesting that what you might do to de-clutter the discussion header. YBG (talk) 00:37, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Your perspective and formatting help are greatly appreciated. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you want me to delete the extra headings as I've suggested in the wikitext? YBG (talk) 19:44, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have strong feelings on that. Just that single-use templates should be deleted. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm wondering what you propose to do with the subtemplates, which are used multiple times. Should they be retained? Substituted? Perhaps you could create on talk:Living presidents and vice presidents of the United States a one- or two-row example of what you'd like to see to replace the tables. I remain open to changing my !vote, but I'd like to understand your proposed alternative. Thanks! YBG (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * E.g. Template:Living presidents of the United States/PlusMinus? Why wouldn't they just be subst:ed into the article? The only instances are other subtemplates of this template. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:00, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * PlusMinus is definitely not necessary, and I've been planning to eliminate it completely. But the other subtemplates are much more problematic. What, for example, would you suggest doing with Living presidents of the United States/Row, Living presidents of the United States/Box?  YBG (talk) 18:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Those are also only transcluded into this template and the article in which it appears. Honestly, this should never have been a template: it's just a table. HTML (and wiki markup) can make tables--there is no need for an off-article template for this. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:43, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:House of Cards (U.S. TV series)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:House of Cards. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:49, 12 October 2018 (UTC) The template is not being used after the content was merged into Template:House of Cards, similar to the style of other adapted television series like Fargo and Westworld. - Radiphus (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * House of Cards (U.S. TV series)
 * redirect to Template:House of Cards. Frietjes (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Super Sentai templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 14. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ohranger
 * Carranger
 * GoGoFive
 * Hurricaneger
 * Magiranger
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Holocene epoch

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  15:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Holocene epoch

Withdrawn Navigation template unused in main space. —hike395 (talk) 02:10, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything wrong with it as a resource. It does not seem properly used, Its items do not link to articles of those names, but link to articles of other names. Moreover, the other articles give the impression of not being well-designed. I think the problem might be lack of attention on this specialized topic. I don't know how desirable it is to clear the space. Will anyone take an interest in this subject? Will anyone create articles of those names? Is it too early to remove this resource?Botteville (talk) 07:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are many instances on our project where there are navbars like this associated with sidebars, in this case the Holocene sidebar, because sometimes consensus is to use the navbar at the bottom of articles rather than the sidebar at or near the top of articles. Just because this navbar is not presently used in articles does not mean it won't be used in the future. I have redesigned the navbar to make it more like the other similar navbars in template Period navbars, and I would like to add this template back in if it survives this Tfd. Also, I shall place a notice of this discussion on the talk pages of the associated WikiProjects, Geology and Environment.  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  11:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Paine makes a good point. I will withdraw my deletion nomination. —hike395 (talk) 15:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).