Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 5



Template:User from

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Uses Template:Userbox and just changes the name of the parameters and includes less parameters, only a few user pages use it, so it wouldn't take long to convert them to use Template:Userbox. There's just no point for having it. – BrandonXLF   (t@lk)  23:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * User from
 * Substitute. Looks like this template was originally a hardcoded userbox, then was converted to transclude Template:Userbox. Not many transclusions, no documentation. I think it can just be substituted, which will put a transclusion of Template:Userbox directly on those pages that use this. --Bsherr (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Amazon Video films and documentaries

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC) For the same reasons brought up for the Netflix templates at previous discussions (one, two, three).  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 15:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Amazon Video films and documentaries
 * Delete and copying Netflix-template-deletion rationale here, "per WP:CLT since templates become less useful with too many links, and it seems fair that this set of films will only continue to grow. It seems better to have a category and/or a list of these films (that can be linked to in a 'See also' section or a very high-level template)." Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 15:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- wooden  superman  15:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - a category is more appropriate here.  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  01:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – category or list is more appropriate. —Joeyconnick (talk) 02:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hochiminh City Wings current roster

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Fails WP:EXISTING with all red links except for one, which itself has been nominated for AfD. —Bagumba (talk) 08:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hochiminh City Wings current roster
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-Military-Army-USAIOH

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 13. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * PD-USGov-Military-Army-USAIOH
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).