Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 9



Module:Country extract

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 07:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC) Deprecated module with only one transclusion outside of userspace. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 20:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Country extract


 * Deprecated by whom? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 08:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC).


 * . &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 11:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete if indeed deprecated in favor of Module:ISO 3166. --Gonnym (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Ancient Greek

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Ancient Greek, which is already done. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC) Propose merging Module:Ancient Greek with Module:Ancient Greek (ALA-LC).
 * Ancient Greek
 * Ancient Greek (ALA-LC)

Duplicate modules; it makes far more sense to specify which romanization method is used as a parameter rather than inventing a whole new module for it. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Support, but I guess simply Module:Ancient Greek would be good enough for a final, merged name of the template? PPEMES (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Support. This is also being discussed at . — Eru·tuon 22:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Support – As the creator of and only major contributor to the latter, I've already agreed that the two should be merged once the code is complete in the former. See the discussion mentioned above. M.Clay1 (talk) 04:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I've modified Module:Ancient Greek so that it can generate ALA-LC transliterations as well as Wiktionary transliterations, and Module:Ancient Greek (ALA-LC) is no longer transcluded anywhere except on its own subpages. — Eru·tuon 18:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Antique Kings of Italy

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Antique_Kings_of_Italy
 * Heads_of_State_of_Italy
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kings of Italy (1861–1946)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Kings_of_Italy_(1861–1946)
 * Heads_of_State_of_Italy
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ship burial customs in Germanic paganism

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was do not merge Frietjes (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Ship burial customs in Germanic paganism with Template:Germanic pagan practices.
 * Ship burial customs in Germanic paganism
 * Germanic pagan practices

As below. PPEMES (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Like below, this template functions as a collection of items for a specialized topic. Not everything here is appropriate for a template called "Germanic pagan practices", and merging it would contribute to template bloat. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I agree. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Template:Germanic pagan practices has been moved to Template:Germanic paganism per RM --DannyS712 (talk) 23:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Death in Germanic mythology

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Death_in_Germanic_mythology
 * Germanic_paganism
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anglo-Saxon metrical charms

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was do not merge Frietjes (talk) 11:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Anglo-Saxon metrical charms with Template:Anglo-Saxon paganism.
 * Anglo-Saxon metrical charms
 * Anglo-Saxon paganism

Might as well keep it collected together? PPEMES (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Many of these poems are explicitly Christian with pagan elements. Merging the template to a template called "Anglo-Saxon paganism" is inappropriate. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I some of these poems are truly Christian, then merging them with the template that is about Anglo-Saxon paganism would not make any sense. Unless someone is able to bring a solid reason and argue that these poems are not Christian, which seems unlikely. Keivan.f  Talk 06:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anne Rice Vampire Chronicles tree

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 16:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Anne_Rice_Vampire_Chronicles_tree
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Snuka wrestling family

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC) WP:NENAN. Only three links and no indication they have children that will be notable soon. StaticVapor message me!   02:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Snuka wrestling family
 * Delete - Insufficient links. 111.68.115.165 (talk) 05:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. J4lambert (talk) 11:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).