Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 9



Template:LACMTATW color

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC) Unused, and per User_talk:RickyCourtney unlikely to be used. If the need arises again we can get the same functionality from Module:Adjacent stations/Los Angeles Metro Busway. Mackensen (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * LACMTATW color
 * Delete per nom and template creator. --Gonnym (talk) 06:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Business in Australia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 17. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Business_in_Australia
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pp-create

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Template was marked as deprecated for the last 5 years and has no transclusions. No real reason to keep it around. Gonnym (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Pp-create
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox saint

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy close. This not the first nomination, and I don't see this one going anywhere else than the previous times. Not to mention that editors rightfully claim that the argument of the nominator is flawed. Non-admin closure. Debresser (talk) 19:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Infobox saint with Template:Infobox religious biography.
 * Infobox saint
 * Infobox religious biography

I think the two templates are representing the same thing, the religious person. If you support this merge, use Support. If you oppose this merge, use Oppose. If you want to have a general discussion, use Comment. —Yours sincerely, Soumyabrata (contributions • subpages) 10:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * oppose -not all religious persons are recognized as saints, regardless of which tradition uses the term. Manannan67 (talk) 23:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * oppose - Not all religious persons are recognized as saints, nor should they be since Saints cover people who belonged to specific Christian denominations that recognize saints, as well as all other religions with important figures who are not saints since saints are only applicable to specific christian denominations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NDV135 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose - as the Guys above said, Not all religious persons are recognized as saints. (Pseudo-Dionysius the areopagite (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gene Eugene

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC) The musician's template consists of five links: the musician's article and four "related" articles that should not be listed in the template. With no notable releases, there are not enough links to justify having a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 02:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Gene Eugene
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Space Raiders

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC) The band's navigational template consists of two links: the band's article and a record label that should not be in the template. The navigational template is only used in the band's article, so it navigates nowhere, there are no notable releases, there are not enough links to justify having a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 02:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Space Raiders
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).