Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 19



Template:2016 J2 League table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC) Unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus in prior deletion discussions and at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 21:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 2016 J2 League table
 * J2 League map 2016
 * 2016 J3 League table
 * J3 League map 2016
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:26, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 14:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Scottish Labour leader

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 08:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC) redundant to Template:Scottish Labour Party, to which I have added all the info in this navbox. I also removed this redundant template from all the articles, so it is now unused. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Scottish Labour leader
 * Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 21:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 China League One table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC) Unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus in prior deletion discussions and at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 2012 China League One table
 * 2012 Chinese Super League table
 * 2012 Japan Football League table
 * 2012 Tajik League table
 * 2013 Chinese Super League table
 * 2013 Japan Football League table
 * 2014 Chinese Super League table
 * 2014 Desert Diamond Cup Standings
 * 2015 China League One table
 * 2015 Chinese Super League table
 * 2016 China League One table
 * 2016 China League Two North table
 * 2016 China League Two South table
 * 2016 Chinese Super League table
 * 2017 China League One table
 * 2017 China League Two North table
 * 2017 China League Two South table
 * 2017 Chinese Super League table
 * 2018 China League One table
 * 2018 China League Two tables
 * Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:26, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 14:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonomy/'Oomyzus

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC) This category is a temporary holding area for taxonomy templates whose deletion will be uncontroversial, because the template is both unused and unnecessary, e.g. because it is incorrectly set up, or relates to a taxon no longer used. Periodically, all templates in this category will be nominated for deletion. For more details, see this talk page thread at Wikipedia talk:Automated taxobox system, the actual category text and previous TfD.
 * Taxonomy/'Oomyzus

I'm nominating all 88 templates in Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates, but as this is purely technical, I'm not tagging them. Gonnym (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete These are templates used by the Automated taxobox system; they are never placed directly on articles. I'm responsible for placing some of these templates in this holding category. As far as I'm aware, these templates have all been blanked (all the ones I've edited certainly are); being blank, if they are ever used they will generate an error that shows up in Category:Taxobox cleanup. None of these should ever be used. The fundamental problem with all of these is that the template has some non-standard format in the template name; there may be a spelling error, a template with a vernacular name rather a scientific name, or a template for a binomial name (the automatic taxobox system doesn't require templates for individual species), among other issues. Plantdrew (talk) 22:58, 19 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Routine clean-up of curated, deletion-ready templates. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 15:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per Plantdrew Mujinga (talk) 05:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).