Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 31



Template:STM bus routes navbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Almost no notable routes, serves very little navigational purpose. Ajf773 (talk) 09:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * STM bus routes navbox

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:52, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * delete, List of STM bus routes is sufficient. Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, not enough links for a navbox. BLAIXX 11:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PctTbl

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 20:28, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Single-use templates, should be merged with the article. Also note that the creator was blocked as a sockpuppet. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * PctTbl
 * PctRow2
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015–16 VTB United League results
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC) unused after being merged (with attribution) with 2015–16 VTB United League Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 2015–16 VTB United League results
 * Bs r
 * Delete as usual. --Gonnym (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have added Bs r to this nomination, since it is transcluded only in 2015–16 VTB United League results. I recommend subst and delete Bs r. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1937–38 Divizia A Group 1 table
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:10, 7 June 2019 (UTC) per consensus at WT:FOOTY, the league tables should be housed in the main season articles, and transcluded directly from the season articles where needed. these have been merged with the parent articles (with attribution) so they are no longer needed in template space. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as usual. --Gonnym (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 07:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Paramore songs
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Paramore. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:26, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Paramore songs with Template:Paramore.
 * Paramore songs
 * Paramore

No need for multiple navboxes. A reader is better served if all the links relating to a subject are kept in a single navbox, and there is no justification to split a navbox of the combined size here. Navboxes of these sizes are routinely merged, see discussions regarding Selena Gomez, Adele, Demi Lovato, Lionel Richie, The Cure, Jamiroquai, A Day to Remember, Pink Floyd, R.E.M., Avicii, etc, etc, etc. -- wooden superman  12:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose the main navbox is supposed to be an overview while the song one details specific tracks, so the "no justification" claim is absurd, especially when lumping everything into one is overfilling the main navbox. "Routinely" also sounds like an exaggeration when not everything gets merged (nor should all be). <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 14:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No it isn't. That's not how navboxes are supposed to work.  All articles relating to a topic are supposed to be contained in one navbox, unless the navbox gets unmanageable, only then should a split be considered.  This is by no means the case here.  You've unilaterally split a lot of these navboxes without any prior discussion, and as you can see from the examples, they usually get merged, despite your opposition.  Perhaps you should consider a discussion before splitting any more off in future.  -- wooden  superman  14:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * People can boldly split when the main box otherwise gets overly stuffed, and if anybody needs to start a discussion, then it's the person who wants to merge. You also overall allow for too much to be contained in one box before a split. When you oftentimes have unilaterally merged song navboxes into main ones (including this one), it would be hypocrisy for you to complain about unilateral actions. Having multiple navboxes in this case makes it easier for readers to find specific track titles in their own container than dumping them all into the main navbox would. They're a distinct subset. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 16:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)


 * merge, no need for two navboxes when one is sufficient. Frietjes (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge - most of the links from the general template are present in the song one. There doesn't seem to be that many songs that will make this template too big. --Gonnym (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Section transclude
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 8. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Section_transclude
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Gutenberg
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 7. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 21:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Gutenberg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).