Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 26



Template:10years

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Replace and delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC) This is a semi-procedural nomination for this template. It was nominated for merging about six weeks ago with the result being to merge into navseasoncats. What was not taken into consideration during the merge was that 10years adds a lot of categorization, which navseasoncats does not. Historically/conventionally this is one of the reasons why we do not assign categories (except for maintenance cats) via template - if the template is changed or deleted the entire category structure goes out the window.I am recommending deletion of this template following a full substitution of its existing functions (once they get ironed out). This will preserve the category structure originally found in 10years but actually implement the decision found in the previous TFD (i.e. keeping this template from becoming a franken-wrapper).In other words, categorization of pages using this template should be done manually, not via the template. Primefac (talk) 23:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 10years
 * As the editor who reinstated and expanded the categories provided by this template, I have no objection to the above. I envisaged that the categories by year (establishments, introductions etc) would be a temporary measure until the template got fully replaced. I added more than was there before in case it was helpful to build out gaps in the existing structure.
 * User:BrownHairedGirl has already created one new template BuildingCompletedYr for a large set (buildings and structures by year) and may have more in mind. Note that such new templates do now build categories, much more simply and reliably than the old ones as they need no parameters.
 * Also, note that another template cat nav 10years exists with similar usage, having different parameters and happening to be used for a different bunch of category series. – Fayenatic  L ondon 07:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I also support replace-and-delete. As Fayenatic notes, I have already begin work on some of the set. --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 07:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * replace and delete per above. Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Liga Super table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC) unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 2004 Liga Super table
 * 2005 Malaysia Super League table
 * 2005–06 Malaysia Super League table
 * 2009 Malaysia Super League table
 * 2010 Malaysia Super League table
 * 2011 Liga Super table
 * 2012 Liga Super table
 * 2014 Liga Super table
 * 2015 Liga Super table
 * 2016 Liga Super table
 * 2017 Malaysia Super League table
 * 2018 Malaysia Super League table
 * 2019 Malaysia Super League table
 * Malaysia Super League table templates
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 09:36, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NGHTCRWLRS

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Fenix down (talk) 09:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC) Premature; navbox contains just three blue links but the articles are already sufficiently interlinked. (Creator is currently indef blocked.) PC78 (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * NGHTCRWLRS
 * Delete, no evidence of further material forthcoming since second album in 2016. – Fayenatic  L ondon 07:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete no sufficient navigational purposes. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NENAN, too few articles to warrant navigation. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * delete, the articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WXW Women's Championship

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. No predjudice for renomination if no new links are added in the coming year. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 17:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC) So few links it is not needed  Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk  17:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * WXW Women's Championship
 * Comment: as this is an ongoing championship, there appears to be potential for growth, both as new champions are named, and as champions achieve wider notability so that Wikipedia articles are written about them. – Fayenatic  L ondon 07:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep there seems to be enough potential in this navbox. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * weak keep, but I would definitely reconsider if there is no additional content a year from now. Frietjes (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).